Wright v. Klein
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (filing #2 ) is granted. The next step in this case is for the court to conduct a preliminary review of the habeas corpus petition in accordance with Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases. The court will conduct this review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LAC)
8:20-cv-00401-RGK-PRSE Doc # 7 Filed: 10/13/20 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 27
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
CLIFFORD WRIGHT III,
Petitioner,
8:20CV401
vs.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DON KLEIN, Douglas County District
Attorney;
Respondent.
Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (filing 1) and a Mot ion
for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (filing 2). Habeas corpus cases at tacking
the legality of a person’s confinement require the payment of a $5.00 filing fee. 28
U.S.C. § 1914(a). However, after considering Petitioner’s financial status as shown
in the records of this court (see inmate trust account statement at filings 6, 7, & 8,
Case No. 8:20CV392), leave to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted and
Petitioner is relieved from paying the filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Petitioner’s Motion for Leave to
Proceed in Forma Pauperis (filing 2) is granted. The next step in this case is for th e
court to conduct a preliminary review of the habeas corpus petition in accordance
with Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases. The court will conduct this
review in its normal course of business.
Dated this 13th day of October, 2020.
BY THE COURT:
Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?