Moss v. Frakes
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner's correspondence (filing 23 ), construed as a motion for status, is granted. Petitioner is advised that this matter is fully submitted and ripe for the court's consideration. The court will issue a deci sion in its normal course of business. Petitioner is further advised that the court entered a Memorandum and Order (filing 20 ) on June 17, 2021, denying his Motion for Second Reply Brief (filing 19 ). The clerk of the court is directed to send a copy of the courts June 17, 2021 Memorandum and Order (filing 20 ) to Petitioner. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed as directed to pro se party)(MKR)
8:20-cv-00474-RGK-PRSE Doc # 24 Filed: 09/09/21 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 2181
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
NICHOLAS M. MOSS,
Petitioner,
8:20CV474
vs.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SCOTT FRAKES,
Respondent.
This matter is before the court on Petitioner’s correspondence, which the
court construes as a motion for status. (Filing 23.) Upon consideration,
IT IS ORDERED that:
1.
Petitioner’s correspondence (filing 23), construed as a motion for
status, is granted. Petitioner is advised that this matter is fully submitted and ripe
for the court’s consideration. The court will issue a decision in its normal course of
business.
2.
Petitioner is further advised that the court entered a Memorandum and
Order (filing 20) on June 17, 2021, denying his Motion for Second Reply Brief
(filing 19). The clerk of the court is directed to send a copy of the court’s June 17,
2021 Memorandum and Order (filing 20) to Petitioner.
Dated this 9th day of September, 2021.
BY THE COURT:
Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?