Moss v. Frakes

Filing 24

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Petitioner's correspondence (filing 23 ), construed as a motion for status, is granted. Petitioner is advised that this matter is fully submitted and ripe for the court's consideration. The court will issue a deci sion in its normal course of business. Petitioner is further advised that the court entered a Memorandum and Order (filing 20 ) on June 17, 2021, denying his Motion for Second Reply Brief (filing 19 ). The clerk of the court is directed to send a copy of the courts June 17, 2021 Memorandum and Order (filing 20 ) to Petitioner. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed as directed to pro se party)(MKR)

Download PDF
8:20-cv-00474-RGK-PRSE Doc # 24 Filed: 09/09/21 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 2181 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA NICHOLAS M. MOSS, Petitioner, 8:20CV474 vs. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SCOTT FRAKES, Respondent. This matter is before the court on Petitioner’s correspondence, which the court construes as a motion for status. (Filing 23.) Upon consideration, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner’s correspondence (filing 23), construed as a motion for status, is granted. Petitioner is advised that this matter is fully submitted and ripe for the court’s consideration. The court will issue a decision in its normal course of business. 2. Petitioner is further advised that the court entered a Memorandum and Order (filing 20) on June 17, 2021, denying his Motion for Second Reply Brief (filing 19). The clerk of the court is directed to send a copy of the court’s June 17, 2021 Memorandum and Order (filing 20) to Petitioner. Dated this 9th day of September, 2021. BY THE COURT: Richard G. Kopf Senior United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?