Minnesota Life Insurance Company v. Estate of Molly R. Stacey et al

Filing 50

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Stacey Defendants' Motion for Release of Funds, Filing No. 47 , is granted to release the Plaintiff's deposited funds held in the Life Insurance Policy Number 2484040N and Annuity Contracts A063176 and A102690. T he Clerk of the Court is to divide the Life Insurance Policy Number 2484040N worth $250,250.00 plus any accrued interest into equal amounts and then distribute the funds equally to Courtney R. Stacey and Austin J. Stacey. The Clerk of the Court is to distribute the funds of Annuity Contract Number A063176 in the amount of $210,196.21 in the amount of $228,305.02 plus any accrued interest to Courtney R. Stacey. The Clerk of the court is to distribute the funds of Annuity Contract N umber A102690 in the amount of $622,210.01 plus any accrued interest to Courtney R. Stacey; Defendants Courtney R. Stacey and Austin J. Stacey are each to complete an Internal Revenue Service Form W-9 and submit the completed form to the Clerk of Court. Upon receipt of such completed Forms W-9, the Clerk of Court shall prepare and mail checks for said funds to Courtney R. Stacey and Austin J. Stacey c/o Ronald E. Reagan, Reagan, Melton & Delaney L.L.P., 4530 Maass Road, Suite 101, Bellevue, NE 68133. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (E-mailed to Finance)(LKO)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA MINNESOTA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 8:21CV15 Plaintiff, vs. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ESTATE OF MOLLY R. STACEY, COURTNEY R. STACEY, AUSTIN J. STACEY, MARK A. MEYER, and STEVEN GREG MEYER, Defendants. This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Release of Funds, Filing No. 47, filed by Defendants Courtney R. Stacey, and Austin J. Stacey (“the Staceys” or “the Stacey Defendants”) responding to the memorandum and order of this Court, Filing No. 46. The Court has jurisdiction over this interpleader action under 28 U.S.C. § 1335. BACKGROUND The interpleaded funds at issue were held by Plaintiff Minnesota Life Insurance Company (“Minnesota Life”) in one life insurance policy and two annuity contracts on behalf of Molly R. Stacey, now deceased. Filing No. 1 at 1. Minnesota Life filed their Interpleader Complaint seeking to “resolve competing claims among potential beneficiaries to [these] Minnesota Life contracts.” Id. Minnesota Life’s concerns of 1 competing complaints stemmed from a pending Nebraska state-court appeal the Stacey Defendants were litigating against co-defendants Mark A. Meyer and Steven Greg Meyer (“Meyer Defendants”) concerning the interpleaded funds. Filing No. 1 at 9–11. Both groups of defendants claimed a right to the interpleaded funds, and the Stacey Defendants prevailed in Nebraska trial court. Filing No. 1 at 7–8. While the Meyer Defendants’ state-court appeal was pending, the Stacey Defendants filed a countercomplaint against Minnesota Life. Filing No. 14. The Staceys alleged that despite the pending appeal of the Meyer Defendants before the Nebraska Supreme Court it would not “expose Minnesota Life to a potential liability.” Filing No. 14 at 2. The Stacey Defendants later moved for summary judgment and asked the Court to release the funds to them. Filing No. 29. However, the motion for summary judgment became moot when the state appellate case ended in the Staceys’ favor, and the Court therefore dismissed the motion. Filing No. 46 at 2. Most recently, because the state appeal was complete and ended in the Stacey Defendants’ favor, this Court instructed the Stacey Defendants to file a motion to finally distribute the interpleaded funds. Id. Therefore, the funds are to be distributed as indicated below. LIFE INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER 2484040N In accordance with the originally intended recipients of the life insurance policy of Molly R. Stacey and the result of the state court proceedings, the Life Insurance Policy Number 2484040N in the amount of $250,250.00 is to be divided and distributed in equal amounts to the Stacey Defendants, Courtney R. Stacey and Austin J. Stacey. Any 2 accrued interest is also to be equally divided between Courtney R. Stacey and Austin J. Stacey. ANNUITY CONTRACTS The Annuity Contracts previously held by Molly R. Stacey are to be distributed as well. The Annuity Contract Number A063176 in the amount of $210,196.21 (valued as of as of December 16, 2020) is to be distributed in whole to Courtney R. Stacey plus any accrued interest. Likewise, the Annuity Contract Number A102690 in the amount of $622,210.01 (valued as of December 16, 2020) is also to be distributed to Courtney R. Stacey plus any accrued interest. Therefore, IT IS SO ORDERED THAT 1. The Stacey Defendants’ Motion for Release of Funds, Filing No. 47, is granted to release the Plaintiff’s deposited funds held in the Life Insurance Policy Number 2484040N and Annuity Contracts A063176 and A102690; 2. The Clerk of the Court is to divide the Life Insurance Policy Number 2484040N worth $250,250.00 plus any accrued interest into equal amounts and then distribute the funds equally to Courtney R. Stacey and Austin J. Stacey; 3. The Clerk of the Court is to distribute the funds of Annuity Contract Number A063176 in the amount of $210,196.21 in the amount of $228,305.02 plus any accrued interest to Courtney R. Stacey; 4. The Clerk of the court is to distribute the funds of Annuity Contract Number A102690 in the amount of $622,210.01 plus any accrued interest to Courtney R. Stacey; 3 5. Defendants Courtney R. Stacey and Austin J. Stacey are each to complete an Internal Revenue Service Form W-9 and submit the completed form to the Clerk of Court; 6. Upon receipt of such completed Forms W-9, the Clerk of Court shall prepare and mail checks for said funds to Courtney R. Stacey and Austin J. Stacey c/o Ronald E. Reagan, Reagan, Melton & Delaney L.L.P., 4530 Maass Road, Suite 101, Bellevue, NE 68133. Dated this 29th day of July, 2022. BY THE COURT: s/ Joseph F. Bataillon Senior United States District Judge 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?