James v. Capps-Wilhelm et al
Filing
5
ORDER that Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP (filing #2 ) is denied as moot. The next step in this case is for the court to conduct a preliminary review of the habeas corpus petition in accordance with Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 cases. The court will conduct this review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(LAC)
8:21-cv-00346-RGK-PRSE Doc # 5 Filed: 09/07/21 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 76
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
JA'MARIO JAMES,
Petitioner,
8:21CV346
vs.
ORDER
MICHELLE CAPPS-WILHELM, and
SCOTT FRAKES,
Respondents.
This matter is before the court on Petitioner’s Motion for Leave to Proceed in
Forma Pauperis (“IFP”). (Filing 2.) Habeas corpus cases attacking the legality of a
person’s confinement require the payment of a $5.00 fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). As
indicated in the court’s records, Petitioner paid the $5.00 fee on September 3 2021.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP (filing 2)
is denied as moot. The next step in this case is for the court to conduct a preliminary
review of the habeas corpus petition in accordance with Rule 4 of the Rules
Governing Section 2254 cases. The court will conduct this review in its normal
course of business.
Dated this 7th day of September, 2021.
BY THE COURT:
Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?