Jacob v. Cotton et al

Filing 40

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss (Filing 39 ) is granted. Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Filing 36 ) shall be filed on o r before December 6, 2022. Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition shall be filed within the time allowed by the Civil Rules for the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (LRM)

8:22-cv-00031-RGK-PRSE Doc # 40 Filed: 11/21/22 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 181

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
DAVID H. JACOB,
Plaintiff,

8:22CV31

vs.
ROSALYN COTTON, Chairperson,
Nebraska Board of Parole; MARK T.
LANGAN, Member, Nebraska Board of
Parole; ROBERT TWISS, Member,
Nebraska Board of Parole; LAYNE
GISSLER, Member, Nebraska Board of
Parole; VIRGIL J. PATLAN, Nebraska
Board of Parole; and HABIB OLOMI,
Member, Nebraska Board of Parole,

MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER

Defendants.

Due to mechanical and water issues affecting the Nebraska State Penitentiary
that has caused Plaintiff to be separated from his legal materials, Plaintiff has filed
a Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss
(Filing 39).
IT IS ORDERED:
1.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief in Opposition to
Motion to Dismiss (Filing 39) is granted;
2.
Plaintiff’s Brief in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
(Filing 36) shall be filed on or before December 6, 2022; and

8:22-cv-00031-RGK-PRSE Doc # 40 Filed: 11/21/22 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 182

3.
Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiff’s Brief in Opposition shall be filed
within the time allowed by the Civil Rules for the United States District Court for
the District of Nebraska.
DATED this 21st day of November, 2022.
BY THE COURT:

Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge

2