Wade v. Pottawattamie County

Filing 27

ORDER that the Court will provide the parties the opportunity to file simultaneous supplemental briefs to address the pending Rule 12(b)(6) motion (Filing No. 6 ). Any such supplemental briefing shall be filed with the Court on or before June 17, 2024. Ordered by Chief Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (JSF)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA KIRSTIE WADE, both individually and on behalf of her minor children, ABRIANA CHAVEZ, JAYDEN CHAVEZ and OSCAR CHAVEZ, JR., 8:22CV298 Plaintiff, ORDER v. POTTAWATTAMIE COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the STATE OF IOWA, Defendant. This matter is before the Court on remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. See Wade v. Pottawattamie County, 100 F.4th 991, 994 (8th Cir. 2024). The Eighth Circuit ruled that this Court erred in granting defendant Pottawattamie County’s Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. See Wade, 100 F.4th at 994. The mandate issued on May 28, 2024 (Filing No. 26). In light of the Eighth Circuit’s decision, this Court will now consider Pottawattamie County’s alternative motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim (Filing No. 6). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Though the issues were fully briefed at the time of the Court’s prior decision, the Court will provide the parties the opportunity to file simultaneous supplemental briefs to address the pending Rule 12(b)(6) motion. Any such supplemental briefing shall be filed with the Court on or before June 17, 2024. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 4th day of June 2024. BY THE COURT: Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. Chief United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?