Wulf et al v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc. et al

Filing 96

FINAL PROGRESSION ORDER (AMENDED) - The trial and pretrial conference will not be set at this time. A status conference to discuss case progression, the parties' interest in settlement, and the trial and pretrial conference settings will be held with the undersigned magistrate judge on December 16, 2024 at 2:00 p.m. by telephone. Counsel shall use the conferencing instructions assigned to this case to participate in the conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Ryan C. Carson. (LKO)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA ROBERT WULF, husband and wife; SANDRA WULF, husband and wife; and GRINNELL MUTUAL REINSURANCE COMPANY, 8:23CV347 Plaintiffs, FINAL PROGRESSION ORDER (AMENDED) vs. THOR MOTOR COACH, INC., BRV EUGENE, LLC, BRV OREGON, LLC, BRV NEBRASKA, LLC, and BRV LINCOLN, LLC, Defendants. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties’ Second Joint Motion for Continuance of Progression Deadlines (Filing No. 95). The motion is granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the final progression order is amended as follows: 1) The trial and pretrial conference will not be set at this time. A status conference to discuss case progression, the parties’ interest in settlement, and the trial and pretrial conference settings will be held with the undersigned magistrate judge on December 16, 2024 at 2:00 p.m. by telephone. Counsel shall use the conferencing instructions assigned to this case to participate in the conference. 2) The deadline for the Parties to move to amend pleadings or add parties is January 15, 2025. 3) Motions to compel written discovery under Rules 33, 34, 36, and 45 must be filed by March 7, 2025. Note: A motion to compel, to quash, or for a disputed protective order shall not be filed without first contacting the chambers of the undersigned magistrate judge to set a conference for discussing the parties’ dispute. 4) 1 The deadlines for complete expert disclosures1 for all experts expected to testify at While treating medical and mental health care providers are generally not considered “specially retained experts,” not all their opinions relate to the care and treatment of a patient. Their opinion testimony is limited to what is stated within their treatment documentation. As to trial, (both retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B)), and non-retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C)), are: For the plaintiff(s): For the defendant(s): March 18, 2025. March 18, 2025. 5) The deposition deadline, including but not limited to depositions for oral testimony only under Rule 45, is April 14, 2025. 6) The deadline for filing motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment is April 25, 2025. 7) The deadline for filing motions to exclude testimony on Daubert and related grounds is April 21, 2025. 8) Motions in limine shall be filed seven days before the pretrial conference. It is not the normal practice to hold hearings on motions in limine or to rule on them prior to the first day of trial. Counsel should plan accordingly. 9) The parties shall comply with all other stipulations and agreements recited in their Rule 26(f) planning report that are not inconsistent with this order. 10) All requests for changes of deadlines or settings established herein shall be directed to the undersigned magistrate judge, including all requests for changes of trial dates. Such requests will not be considered absent a showing of due diligence in the timely progression of this case and the recent development of circumstances, unanticipated prior to the filing of the motion, which require that additional time be allowed. Dated this 25th day of November, 2024. BY THE COURT: s/ Ryan C. Carson United States Magistrate Judge each such expert, any opinions which are not stated within that expert’s treatment records and reports must be separately and timely disclosed.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?