Dan v. State of Nebraska et al

Filing 15

ORDER denying as moot the Plaintiff's 14 MOTION for Extension of Time. Plaintiff is advised that the next step in Plaintiff's case will be for the Court to conduct an initial review of Plaintiffs claims to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The Court will conduct this initial review in its normal course of business. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
ANTHONY T. DAN,
Plaintiff,

8:23CV532

vs.
ORDER
STATE OF NEBRASKA, CHERL FINN,
Medical Staff - individual capacity;
MEDICAL STAFF, Medical Staff - individual
capacity;
WALLS, Case Manager individual capacity;
BOYER-SEARS,
Lieutenant - individual capacity; BROOKS,
Officer - individual capacity; BEEBE, Case
Manager - individual capacity; MCNAIR,
Case Manager - individual capacity;
BUSBOOM, Assistant Warden - individual
capacity; CRAIG GABLE, Warden individual capacity; B. HOLLISTER, Dr.,
Mental Health Representative - individual
capacity; C. HINZMAN, Classification
Representative - individual capacity; R.
BRITTENHAM, Intelligence Representativeindividual capacity; DIANE SABAKSTARINE, Chief of Operations - individual
capacity; ROBERT MADSEN, Deputy
Director - individual capacity; and ROB
JEFFREYS, Director- individual capacity;
Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time, Filing
No. 14, filed on February 2, 2024, in which Plaintiff requests a 30-day extension to pay
his initial partial filing fee because the Nebraska Department of Corrections Central
Office needs to finish processing Plaintiff’s check. The Court received Plaintiff’s initial
partial filing fee payment of $3.36 on January 31, 2024. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that:
1.

Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time, Filing No. 14, is denied as moot.

2.

Plaintiff is advised that the next step in Plaintiff’s case will be for the Court

to conduct an initial review of Plaintiff’s claims to determine whether summary dismissal
is appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The Court will conduct this initial review in
its normal course of business.

Dated this 5th day of February, 2024.
BY THE COURT:

Joseph F. Bataillon
Senior United States District Judge

2