Foreman v. Strigenz
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP, Filing No. 2, is granted. Plaintiff must pay an initial partial filing fee of $7.90 within 30 days unless the Court extends the time in which he has to pay in response t o a written motion. The Clerk's Office is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: April 10, 2025: initial partial filing fee payment due. Plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel, Filing No. 3, is denied without prejudice to reassertion. Ordered by Senior Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party and institution as directed) (ADB)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
KAISER D. FOREMAN,
Plaintiff,
8:25CV85
vs.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
THOMAS P. STRIGENZ,
Defendant.
This matter is before the Court on a Motion for Leave to Proceed in
Forma Pauperis (“IFP”), Filing No. 2, and a Motion to Appoint Counsel, Filing
No. 3, filed by Plaintiff Kaiser D. Foreman (“Plaintiff”). The Court has received
a certified copy of Plaintiff’s trust account statement. Filing No. 7. Plaintiff is
permitted to proceed IFP, however his motion to appoint counsel shall be
denied without prejudice to reassertion.
I. MOTION TO PROCEED IFP
Prisoner plaintiffs are required to pay the full amount of the Court’s
$350.00 filing fee by making monthly payments to the Court, even if the
prisoner is proceeding IFP. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). The Prison Litigation Reform
Act “makes prisoners responsible for their filing fees the moment the prisoner
brings a civil action or files an appeal.” In re Tyler, 110 F.3d 528, 529–30 (8th
Cir. 1997); Jackson v. N.P. Dodge Realty Co., 173 F. Supp. 2d 951 (D. Neb.
2001).
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1), Plaintiff must pay an initial partial
filing fee in the amount of 20 percent of the greater of Plaintiff’s average
monthly account balance or average monthly deposits for the six months
preceding the filing of the Complaint. Here, the Court finds the initial partial
filing fee is $7.90, based on average monthly deposits in the amount of $39.50.
Plaintiff must pay this initial partial filing fee within 30 days or his case will
be subject to dismissal. Plaintiff may request an extension of time if one is
needed.
In addition to the initial partial filing fee, Plaintiff must “make monthly
payments of 20 percent of the preceding month’s income credited to the
prisoner’s account.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The statute places the burden on
the prisoner’s institution to collect the additional monthly payments and
forward them to the Court as follows:
After payment of the initial partial filing fee, the prisoner shall be
required to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding
month’s income credited to the prisoner’s account. The agency
having custody of the prisoner shall forward payments from the
prisoner’s account to the clerk of the court each time the amount
in the account exceeds $10 until the filing fees are paid.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). Therefore, after payment in full of the initial partial
filing fee, Plaintiff’s institution must collect the remaining installments of the
filing fee and forward the payments to the Court.
Plaintiff is advised he will remain responsible for the entire filing fee, as
long as he is a prisoner, even if the case is dismissed at some later time. See
In re Tyler, 110 F.3d at 529–30; Jackson, 173 F. Supp. 2d at 951.
II. MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL
Plaintiff seeks appointment of counsel arguing that appointment is
appropriate because as an indigent prisoner the Sarpy County Prosecutor’s
Office ignores discovery requests. Filing No. 3 at 1. Plaintiff argues that
having counsel would allow Plaintiff to obtain the discovery he needs
(apparently in an ongoing criminal action). Id.
“There is no constitutional or statutory right to appointed counsel in civil
cases.” Phillips v. Jasper Cnty. Jail, 437 F.3d 791, 794 (8th Cir. 2006). A
district court “may request an attorney to represent” an indigent civil litigant,
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1), but it has a “good deal of discretion” in deciding whether
to do so, Chambers v. Pennycook, 641 F.3d 898, 909 (8th Cir. 2011). “Relevant
criteria for determining whether counsel should be requested include the
factual and legal complexity of the case, the plaintiff’s ability to investigate the
facts and to present the claims, and the presence or absence of conflicting
testimony.” Recca v. Omaha Police Dep’t, 859 F. App’x 3, 4 (8th Cir. 2021)
(citing Davis v. Scott, 94 F.3d 444, 447 (8th Cir. 1996)).
The Court has carefully reviewed the record and finds there is no need
for the appointment of counsel at this time. As such, Plaintiff’s motion for
appointment of counsel shall be denied without prejudice to reassertion.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP, Filing No. 2, is
granted.
2.
Plaintiff must pay an initial partial filing fee of $7.90 within 30
days unless the Court extends the time in which he has to pay in response to a
written motion.
3.
After payment of the initial partial filing fee, Plaintiff’s institution
must collect the additional monthly payments in the manner set forth in 28
U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2), quoted above, and forward those payments to the Court.
4.
The Clerk’s Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the
appropriate official at Plaintiff’s institution.
5.
The Clerk’s Office is directed to set a pro se case management
deadline in this case using the following text: April 10, 2025: initial partial
filing fee payment due.
6.
Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel, Filing No. 3, is denied
without prejudice to reassertion.
7.
If Plaintiff needs additional time to comply with this Memorandum
and Order he must file a written motion requesting an extension of time with
Court prior to the deadline for compliance.
8.
Plaintiff is advised that, following payment of the initial partial
filing fee, the next step in Plaintiff’s case will be for the Court to conduct an
initial review of Plaintiff’s claims to determine whether summary dismissal is
appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The Court will conduct this initial
review in its normal course of business.
Dated this 11th day of March, 2025.
BY THE COURT:
John M. Gerrard
Senior United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?