ROBERT J. FARMER v. STATE OF NEVADA (DEATH PENALTY)
Filing
202
ORDER Granting 201 Suggestion of Death and Motion to Dismiss without prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 6/15/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
ROBERT JEFFREY FARMER,
10
Petitioner,
11
vs.
12
JACKIE CRAWFORD, et al.,
13
14
Respondents.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
/
2:93-cv-0434-JCM-CWH
ORDER
15
16
This action is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus by Robert Jeffrey Farmer, a Nevada
17
prisoner. The case has been stayed since August 30, 2006, pending proceedings in state court.
18
See Order entered August 30, 2006 (ECF No. 185).
19
On June 12, 2012, petitioner’s counsel filed a “Suggestion of Death and Motion to Dismiss”
20
(ECF No. 201). In that filing, counsel states that Farmer died on April 24, 2012. Suggestion of
21
Death and Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 201), p. 1, lines 17-18. Counsel asserts that Farmer’s death
22
moots this action, and requests that the action should therefore be dismissed.
23
Farmer’s death renders his habeas corpus action moot, and subject to dismissal. See Garceau
24
v. Woodford, 399 F.3d 1101 (9th Cir. 2005); Griffey v. Lindsey, 349 F.3d 1157 (9th Cir. 2003).
25
The court will, therefore, grant the motion to dismiss this action, and dismiss the action
26
without prejudice on account of the petitioner’s death.
1
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 201) is GRANTED.
2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE,
3
4
5
as moot, on account of the death of the petitioner.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall ENTER JUDGMENT
ACCORDINGLY.
6
7
15th
Dated this _____ day of June, 2012.
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?