DAVID BOLLINGER v. E.K. MCDANIEL, et al.

Filing 300

ORDER granting ECF No. 299 Motion to Extend Time. Respondents will have until and including July 16, 2021, to file their supplemental answer, responding to Petitioner David Bollinger's Claim 7D. In all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set forth in the order entered March 31, 2020 (ECF No. 292 ) will remain in effect Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/2/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 *** 6 DAVID BOLLINGER , Case No. 2:98-cv-01263-MMD-BNW 7 8 9 10 Petitioner, ORDER v. WILLIAM GITTERE , et al., Respondents. 11 In this capital habeas corpus action, Respondents were due on June 1, 2021, to 12 file their supplemental answer responding to Petitioner David Bollinger’s Claim 7D. (ECF 13 No. 298.) On June 1, 2021, Respondents filed a motion for extension of time (ECF No. 14 299), requesting a 45-day extension of time, to July 16, 2021, to file their supplemental 15 answer. This would be the first extension of this deadline. Respondents’ counsel states 16 that the extension of time is necessary primarily because of her obligations in other cases. 17 Petitioner does not oppose the motion for extension of time. The Court finds that 18 Respondents’ motion for extension of time is made in good faith and not solely for the 19 purpose of delay, and that there is good cause for the extension of time requested. 20 It is therefore ordered that Respondents’ Motion for Enlargement of Time (ECF No. 21 299) is granted. Respondents will have until and including July 16, 2021, to file their 22 supplemental answer, responding to Petitioner David Bollinger’s Claim 7D. In all other 23 respects, the schedule for further proceedings set forth in the order entered March 31, 24 2020 (ECF No. 292) will remain in effect. 25 DATED THIS 2nd Day of June 2021. 26 27 28 MIRANDA M. DU CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?