DAVID BOLLINGER v. E.K. MCDANIEL, et al.

Filing 308

ORDER granting ECF No. 307 Motion to Extend Time. Respondents will have until and including August 31, 2021, to file their supplemental answer, responding to Petitioner David Bollinger's Claim 7D. In all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set forth in the order entered March 31, 2020 (ECF No. 292 ) will remain in effect. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 8/30/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SC)

Download PDF
Case 2:98-cv-01263-MMD-BNW Document 308 Filed 08/30/21 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 *** 6 DAVID BOLLINGER, Case No. 2:98-cv-01263-MMD-BNW 7 8 9 10 Petitioner, ORDER v. WILLIAM GITTERE, et al., Respondents. 11 In this capital habeas corpus action, after four extensions of time, Respondents 12 were due on August 27, 2021, to file their supplemental answer responding to Petitioner 13 David Bollinger’s Claim 7D. (ECF Nos. 298, 300, 302, 304, 306.) On August 27, 2021, 14 Respondents filed a motion for extension of time (ECF No. 307) requesting a further 4- 15 day extension of time, to August 31, 2021, to file their supplemental answer. 16 Respondents’ counsel states that the extension of time is necessary because of 17 scheduling issues. The Court finds that Respondents’ motion for extension of time is 18 made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay, and that there is good cause 19 for the extension of time requested. 20 It is therefore ordered that Respondents’ motion for enlargement of time (ECF No. 21 307) is granted. Respondents will have until and including August 31, 2021, to file their 22 supplemental answer, responding to Petitioner David Bollinger’s Claim 7D. In all other 23 respects, the schedule for further proceedings set forth in the order entered March 31, 24 2020 (ECF No. 292) will remain in effect. 25 DATED THIS 30th Day of August 2021. 26 27 28 MIRANDA M. DU CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?