DAVID BOLLINGER v. E.K. MCDANIEL, et al.

Filing 325

ORDERED that Bollinger's motion for extension of time (ECF No. 324 ) is granted. Petitioner will have until and including October 21, 2022, to file his reply to Respondents' amended supplemental answer (ECF No. 323 ). Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/23/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

5

***

6
7
8
9

DAVID BOLLINGER,
v.

Case No. 2:98-cv-01263-MMD-BNW
Petitioner,

ORDER

WILLIAM GITTERE, et al.,
Respondents.

10
11

In this capital habeas corpus action, on July 25, 2022, Respondents filed an

12

amended supplemental answer (ECF No. 323), responding to Petitioner David Bollinger’s

13

Claim 7D, as directed in the order of May 24, 2022 (ECF No. 322). Bollinger was due to

14

file a reply to the amended supplemental answer by September 23, 2022. (Id.) (60 days

15

for reply).

16

On September 23, 2022, Bollinger filed a motion for extension of time (ECF No.

17

324) requesting a 28-day extension of time, to October 21, 2022, to file his reply to the

18

amended supplemental answer. Bollinger’s counsel states that the extension of time is

19

necessary because of her obligations in other cases. (Id. at 3.) Bollinger’s counsel also

20

states that Respondents’ counsel does not oppose the motion for extension of time. (Id.

21

at 4.) The Court finds that Bollinger’s motion for extension of time is made in good faith

22

and not solely for the purpose of delay, and that there is good cause for the extension of

23

time requested.

24

It is therefore ordered that Bollinger’s motion for extension of time (ECF No. 324)

25

is granted. Petitioner will have until and including October 21, 2022, to file his reply to

26

Respondents’ amended supplemental answer.

27
28

1

DATED THIS 23rd Day of September 2022.

2
3
4
5

MIRANDA M. DU
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2