CHARLES MCNELTON v. E.K. MCDANIEL, et al. (DEATH PENALTY)
Filing
130
ORDER Granting 127 Motion to Lift Stay. Amended Petition due within 90 days. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 4/25/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
CHARLES McNELTON,
10
Petitioner,
11
vs.
12
RENEE BAKER, et al.,
13
Respondents.
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
/
2:00-cv-0284-RCJ-CWH
ORDER
15
On August 29, 2007, this court entered a stay in the federal proceedings to allow petitioner to
16
exhaust the unexhausted claims in his amended petition. ECF No. 104. On April 4, 2013, petitioner
17
filed a motion to lift the stay and reopen these proceedings, indicating that his state court proceedings
18
have been concluded. ECF No. 127. Respondents have not filed an opposition or other response to
19
petitioner’s motion.
20
Good cause appearing, the court shall reopen proceedings in this matter. In addition,
21
petitioner will be allowed the opportunity to file an amended petition. However, petitioner is
22
cautioned that, as provided in the order granting the stay, an amended petition shall contain only
23
claims for which he has exhausted state court remedies. ECF No. 104, p. 5.
24
25
26
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner’s motion to lift stay (ECF No. 127) is
GRANTED. The clerk shall administratively REOPEN this action. The stay of this action is lifted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall have ninety (90) days from the date this
1
order is entered within which to file an amended petition for habeas corpus relief. The amended
2
petition shall contain only exhausted claims. Upon the filing of the amended petition or the
3
expiration of time allotted for that purpose, the court shall schedule further proceedings in this case.
4
DATED:
April 25, 2013.
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?