Michael Hampton Sonner v. E.K. McDaniel, et al, (DEATH PENALTY)

Filing 144

MINUTE ORDER granting petitioner's motion for enlargement of time 143 . Petitioner shall have until 8/20/12 within which to file his opposition to respondents' motion to dismiss 132 . (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JRB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA MICHAEL SONNER, Petitioner, 2:00-cv-1101 KJD-CWH vs. MINUTES OF THE COURT RENEE BAKER, et al., June 21, 2012 Respondents. _______________________________/ PRESENT: THE HONORABLE KENT J. DAWSON DEPUTY CLERK: JAMES R. BARKLEY , UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS: NONE APPEARING MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS: XXX Petitioner, through counsel, has moved for an enlargement of time within which to file an opposition to respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 132). ECF No. 143. Based on the declaration of petitioner’s counsel, the court is satisfied that the request is in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay. In addition, petitioner’s counsel represents that opposing counsel does not object to the extension. Good cause appearing, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for enlargement of time (ECF No. 143) is GRANTED. Petitioner shall have until and including August 20, 2012, within which to file his opposition to respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 132). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in all other respects, the schedule set forth in the scheduling order entered on January 9, 2012 (ECF No. 128), shall remain in effect. LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK By: /s/ James R. Barkley Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?