Michael Hampton Sonner v. E.K. McDaniel, et al, (DEATH PENALTY)
Filing
144
MINUTE ORDER granting petitioner's motion for enlargement of time 143 . Petitioner shall have until 8/20/12 within which to file his opposition to respondents' motion to dismiss 132 . (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JRB)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
MICHAEL SONNER,
Petitioner,
2:00-cv-1101 KJD-CWH
vs.
MINUTES OF THE COURT
RENEE BAKER, et al.,
June 21, 2012
Respondents.
_______________________________/
PRESENT:
THE HONORABLE
KENT J. DAWSON
DEPUTY CLERK:
JAMES R. BARKLEY
, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
REPORTER:
NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER:
NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS:
NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
XXX
Petitioner, through counsel, has moved for an enlargement of time within which to file an
opposition to respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 132). ECF No. 143. Based on the
declaration of petitioner’s counsel, the court is satisfied that the request is in good faith and not
solely for the purpose of delay. In addition, petitioner’s counsel represents that opposing counsel
does not object to the extension. Good cause appearing,
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for enlargement of time (ECF
No. 143) is GRANTED. Petitioner shall have until and including August 20, 2012, within
which to file his opposition to respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 132).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in all other respects, the schedule set forth in the
scheduling order entered on January 9, 2012 (ECF No. 128), shall remain in effect.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By:
/s/ James R. Barkley
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?