Michael Hampton Sonner v. E.K. McDaniel, et al, (DEATH PENALTY)
Filing
173
MINUTE ORDER granting Petitioner's Motion 172 to extend the time within which to file a reply to respondents' answer 171 and a motion for an evidentiary hearing. Both filings are now due August 8, 2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JRB)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
MICHAEL SONNER,
Petitioner,
2:00-cv-1101 KJD-CWH
vs.
MINUTES OF THE COURT
RENEE BAKER, et al.,
June 5, 2013
Respondents.
_______________________________/
PRESENT:
THE HONORABLE
KENT J. DAWSON
DEPUTY CLERK:
JAMES R. BARKLEY
COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER:
, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
REPORTER:
NONE APPEARING
NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS:
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
NONE APPEARING
XXX
Petitioner, through counsel, has moved for a 45-day enlargement of time within which to
file a reply to the respondents’ answer (ECF No. 171) and a motion for an evidentiary hearing
ECF No. 172. Based on the declaration of petitioner’s counsel, the court is satisfied that the
request is in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay. In addition, petitioner’s counsel
represents to the court that opposing counsel does not object to the extension. Good cause
appearing,
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for enlargement of time (ECF
No. 172) is GRANTED. Petitioner shall have until and including August 8, 2013, within which
to file a reply to the respondents’ answer (ECF No. 171) and a motion for an evidentiary hearing.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in all other respects, the schedule set forth in the
scheduling order entered on January 9, 2012 (ECF No. 128), shall remain in effect.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By:
2
/s/ James R. Barkley
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?