Michael Hampton Sonner v. E.K. McDaniel, et al, (DEATH PENALTY)

Filing 238

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS granting petitioner's motion to extend time 237 . Petitioner shall have until and including November 6, 2017, to file his reply in support of his motion to alter or amend judgment 233 . (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JRB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA MICHAEL SONNER, Petitioner, 2:00-cv-1101 KJD-CWH vs. MINUTES OF THE COURT TIMOTHY FILSON, et al., October 16, 2017 Respondents. _______________________________/ PRESENT: THE HONORABLE KENT J. DAWSON DEPUTY CLERK: JAMES R. BARKLEY , UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS: NONE APPEARING MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS: XXX Petitioner, through counsel, has requested an extension of twenty-one (21) days within which to file a reply in support of his motion to alter or amend judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) (ECF No. 233). ECF No. 237. Based on the declaration of petitioner’s counsel, the court is satisfied that the request is in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay. In addition, petitioner’s counsel represents to the court that opposing counsel does not object to the extension. Good cause appearing, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for enlargement of time (ECF No. 237) is GRANTED. Petitioner shall have until and including November 6, 2017, to file his reply in support of his motion to alter or amend judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) (ECF No. 233). DEBRA K. KEMPI, CLERK By: /s/ James R. Barkley Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?