Michael Hampton Sonner v. E.K. McDaniel, et al, (DEATH PENALTY)
Filing
238
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS granting petitioner's motion to extend time 237 . Petitioner shall have until and including November 6, 2017, to file his reply in support of his motion to alter or amend judgment 233 . (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JRB)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
MICHAEL SONNER,
Petitioner,
2:00-cv-1101 KJD-CWH
vs.
MINUTES OF THE COURT
TIMOTHY FILSON, et al.,
October 16, 2017
Respondents.
_______________________________/
PRESENT:
THE HONORABLE
KENT J. DAWSON
DEPUTY CLERK:
JAMES R. BARKLEY
, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
REPORTER:
NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER:
NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS: NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
XXX
Petitioner, through counsel, has requested an extension of twenty-one (21) days within
which to file a reply in support of his motion to alter or amend judgment pursuant to Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) (ECF No. 233). ECF No. 237. Based on the declaration of
petitioner’s counsel, the court is satisfied that the request is in good faith and not solely for the
purpose of delay. In addition, petitioner’s counsel represents to the court that opposing counsel
does not object to the extension. Good cause appearing,
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for enlargement of time (ECF
No. 237) is GRANTED. Petitioner shall have until and including November 6, 2017, to file his
reply in support of his motion to alter or amend judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 59(e) (ECF No. 233).
DEBRA K. KEMPI, CLERK
By:
/s/ James R. Barkley
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?