MANUEL SAUCEDO LOPEZ V. E.K. MCDANIEL ET AL (DEATH PENALTY)

Filing 176

ORDER GRANTING ECF No. 171 / 173 Motion to Amend: Reply to ECF No. 172 Response re ECF No. 139 Motion to dismiss due by 6/20/2018. Respondents' motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 174 ) and petitioner's motion for ruling on motion for leave to file an amended opposition (ECF No. 175 ) are DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 5/21/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 MANUEL SAUCEDO LOPEZ, 9 Petitioner, 10 vs. 11 TIMOTHY FILSON, et al., 12 Respondents. 13 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) / 2:01-cv-00406-RCJ-NJK ORDER On March 1, 2018, petitioner filed a motion for leave to file an amended opposition to the 15 respondents’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 139). ECF No. 171. Respondents have filed a response to 16 that motion indicating that they do not oppose it, but ask the court for thirty days from the court’s 17 decision on the motion within which to file their reply to the amended opposition. ECF No. 173. 18 Good cause appearing, both motions (ECF Nos. 171/173) are GRANTED. 19 20 Respondents shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this order within which to file a reply to petitioner’s amended opposition (ECF No. 172). 21 Respondents’ motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 174) and petitioner’s motion for 22 ruling on motion for leave to file an amended opposition (ECF Nbo. 175) are DENIED as moot. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: May 21, 2018. 25 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?