William Witter vs. E.K. McDaniel, et al.,

Filing 259

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/28/2014. By Deputy Clerk: James R. Barkley. Respondents' 258 Second Motion for Enlargement of Time is Granted. Respondents shall file their responses to Petitioner 9;s 250 Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment by 11/10/2014. Respondents' prior 254 Motion for Enlargement of Time is Denied as moot. Petitioner's 249 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages is Granted Nunc Pro Tunc as of 9/9/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA WILLIAM WITTER, Petitioner, 2:01-CV-1034-RCJ-CWH vs. MINUTES OF THE COURT RENEE BAKER, et al., October 28, 2014 Respondents. _______________________________/ PRESENT: THE HONORABLE DEPUTY CLERK: ROBERT C. JONES JAMES R. BARKLEY COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER: , UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE REPORTER: NONE APPEARING NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS: MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS: NONE APPEARING XXX Respondents, through counsel, have filed a motion for enlargement of time within which to file and serve their response to petitioner’s motion to alter or amend judgment (ECF No. 250). ECF No. 258. The court finds that respondents’ request is made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay. In addition, respondents’ counsel represents to the court that opposing counsel does not oppose the request. Good cause appearing, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondents’ motion for enlargement of time (ECF No. 258) is GRANTED. Respondents shall file their response to petitioner’s motion to alter or amend judgment (ECF No. 250) on or before November 10, 2014. Respondents’ prior motion for enlargement of time (ECF No. 254) is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for leave to file excess pages (ECF No. 249) is GRANTED nunc pro tunc as of September 9, 2014. LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK By: 2 /s/ James R. Barkley Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?