David Michael Pellegrini vs. E.K. McDaniel, et al (DEATH PENALTY)

Filing 141

ORDER granting ECF No. 140 Motion to Extend Time : Petitioner's surreply regarding the order to show cause (ECF No. 132 ) will be due on July 7, 2021. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 7/1/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 5 *** DAVID MICHAEL PELLEGRINI, Petitioner, 6 7 8 Case No. 2:01-cv-01382-HDM-BNW ORDER v. TIM GARRETT, et al., Respondents. 9 10 11 In this habeas corpus action, on April 7, 2021, the Court ordered the petitioner, 12 David Michael Pellegrini, represented by appointed counsel, to show cause why this 13 action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and/or for failure to comply with 14 the Court’s orders. See Order entered April 7, 2021 (ECF No. 132). Pellegrini filed his 15 response to the order to show cause on May 8, 2021 (ECF No. 133). Respondents filed 16 their reply on June 14, 2021 (ECF No. 138). Pellegrini’s surreply was then due on 17 June 29, 2021. See Order entered April 7, 2021 (ECF No. 132) (15 days for surreply). 18 On June 29, 2021, Pellegrini filed a motion for extension of time (ECF No. 140), 19 requesting an extension of time to July 7, 2021 (an eight-day extension) for his surreply. 20 Pellegrini’s counsel states that the extension of time is necessary because of her 21 obligations in another case. The Court determines that the motion for extension of time 22 is made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay, and that there is good 23 cause for the extension of time. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Extend Time (ECF No. 2 140) is GRANTED. Petitioner’s surreply regarding the order to show cause will be due 3 on July 7, 2021. 4 5 DATED THIS 1st day of July, 2021. 6 7 8 HOWARD D. McKIBBEN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?