David Michael Pellegrini vs. E.K. McDaniel, et al (DEATH PENALTY)
Filing
141
ORDER granting ECF No. 140 Motion to Extend Time : Petitioner's surreply regarding the order to show cause (ECF No. 132 ) will be due on July 7, 2021. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 7/1/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
5
***
DAVID MICHAEL PELLEGRINI,
Petitioner,
6
7
8
Case No. 2:01-cv-01382-HDM-BNW
ORDER
v.
TIM GARRETT, et al.,
Respondents.
9
10
11
In this habeas corpus action, on April 7, 2021, the Court ordered the petitioner,
12
David Michael Pellegrini, represented by appointed counsel, to show cause why this
13
action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and/or for failure to comply with
14
the Court’s orders. See Order entered April 7, 2021 (ECF No. 132). Pellegrini filed his
15
response to the order to show cause on May 8, 2021 (ECF No. 133). Respondents filed
16
their reply on June 14, 2021 (ECF No. 138). Pellegrini’s surreply was then due on
17
June 29, 2021. See Order entered April 7, 2021 (ECF No. 132) (15 days for surreply).
18
On June 29, 2021, Pellegrini filed a motion for extension of time (ECF No. 140),
19
requesting an extension of time to July 7, 2021 (an eight-day extension) for his surreply.
20
Pellegrini’s counsel states that the extension of time is necessary because of her
21
obligations in another case. The Court determines that the motion for extension of time
22
is made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay, and that there is good
23
cause for the extension of time.
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Extend Time (ECF No.
2
140) is GRANTED. Petitioner’s surreply regarding the order to show cause will be due
3
on July 7, 2021.
4
5
DATED THIS 1st day of July, 2021.
6
7
8
HOWARD D. McKIBBEN,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?