John Oliver Snow vs E.K. McDaniel, et al (DEATH PENALTY)

Filing 232

ORDERED that Respondents' motion for enlargement of time (ECF No. 231 ) is granted. Respondents will have until and including March 5, 2021, to file their answer. In all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set forth in the order entered October 21, 2020 (ECF No. 225 ) will remain in effect. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 3/2/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
Case 2:03-cv-00292-MMD-CWH Document 232 Filed 03/02/21 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 *** 6 JOHN OLIVER SNOW, Case No. 2:03-cv-00292-MMD-CWH 7 8 Petitioner, ORDER v. 9 10 11 WILLIAM GITTERE, et al., Respondents. 12 In this habeas corpus action, after their first 30-day extension of time and a second 13 11-day extension of time, Respondents were due to file an answer on March 1, 2021. 14 (ECF Nos. 225, 227, 230.) On that date, Respondents filed a motion for a third extension 15 of time (ECF No. 231), requesting a four-day extension until March 5, 2021. Respondents’ 16 counsel states that the extension of time is necessary because of her obligations in other 17 cases and because of personal medical issues. The Court finds that Respondents’ motion 18 for extension of time is made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay, and 19 there is good cause for the extension of time requested. 20 It is therefore ordered that Respondents’ motion for enlargement of time (third 21 request) (ECF No. 231) is granted. Respondents will have until and including March 5, 22 2021, to file their answer. In all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set 23 forth in the order entered October 21, 2020 (ECF No. 225) will remain in effect. 24 DATED THIS 2nd Day of March 2021. 25 26 27 28 MIRANDA M. DU CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?