KEVIN JAMES LISLE v. E.K. MCDANIEL

Filing 194

ORDER Granting 193 Motion to Extend Time. Amended Petition or notice due by 10/21/2016. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set forth in the order entered June 22, 2016 191 shall remain in effect. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 8/23/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 KEVIN JAMES LISLE, 9 Petitioner, 10 vs. 11 2:03-cv-01005-JCM-CWH RENEE BAKER, et al., ORDER 12 13 Respondents. / 14 15 In this capital habeas corpus action, the petitioner, Kevin James Lisle, was due to file a third 16 amended petition for writ of habeas corpus, or notice that he will not file one, by August 22, 2016. 17 See Order entered June 22, 2016 (ECF No. 191). 18 On August 19, 2016, Lisle filed a motion for extension of time (ECF No. 193), requesting a 19 60-day extension of time, to October 21, 2016. Lisle’s counsel states that the extension of time is 20 necessary primarily because of his obligations in other cases. The court finds that the motion for 21 extension of time is made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay, and there is good 22 cause for the requested extension of time. 23 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondents’ motion for extension of time (ECF No. 24 193) is GRANTED. Petitioner shall have until and including October 21, 2016, to file a third 25 amended habeas petition, or notice that he will not file one. 26 1 2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set forth in the order entered June 22, 2016 (ECF No. 191) shall remain in effect. 3 4 August 23, 2016. Dated this _____ day of August, 2016. 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?