KEVIN JAMES LISLE v. E.K. MCDANIEL

Filing 196

ORDER Granting 195 MOTION to Partially Waive Local Rules IA 10-3(e), 7-3(b), 7- 3(c). Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/17/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DL)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 KEVIN JAMES LISLE, 9 Petitioner, 10 vs. 11 2:03-cv-01005-JCM-CWH RENEE BAKER, et al., ORDER 12 13 Respondents. / 14 15 In this capital habeas corpus action, the petitioner, Kevin James Lisle, is due to file a third 16 amended petition for writ of habeas corpus, or notice that he will not file one, by October 21, 2016. 17 See Order entered August 23, 2016 (ECF No. 194). 18 On October 13, 2016, Lisle filed a motion to waive certain local rules for purposes of all 19 further proceedings in this case (ECF No. 195). Lisle requests a waiver, for purposes of this action, 20 of Local Rules IA 10-3(e) (cover sheets for exhibits must include descriptors of exhibits), 7-3(b) 21 (page limits), and 7-3(c) (motions for leave to exceed page limits). The court finds that there is good 22 cause for waiver of those rules for purposes of this capital habeas corpus action. 23 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner’s Motion to Partially Waive Local Rules 24 IA 10-3(e), 7-3(b), 7-3(c) (ECF No. 195) is GRANTED. Local Rules IA 10-3(e) (descriptors of 25 exhibits on cover sheets), 7-3(b) (page limits), and 7-3(c) (motions for leave to exceed page limits) 26 are waived in this action, for all parties. 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d), the 2 clerk of the court shall substitute Timothy Filson for Renee Baker, on the docket for this case, as the 3 respondent warden, and shall update the caption of the action to reflect this change. 4 5 Dated this _____17, 2016. October day of October, 2016. 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?