KEVIN JAMES LISLE v. E.K. MCDANIEL
ORDER re schedule for further briefing of motions. See Order for details/deadlines. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/12/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
KEVIN JAMES LISLE,
TIMOTHY FILSON, et al.,
In this capital habeas corpus action, the petitioner, Kevin James Lisle, filed a third amended
petition for writ of habeas corpus on October 21, 2016 (ECF No. 197). Respondents filed a motion
to dismiss on March 20, 2017 (ECF No. 216). Lisle filed an opposition to the motion to dismiss on
August 11, 2017 (ECF No. 232). On that date, Lisle also filed a motion for leave to conduct
discovery (ECF No. 236), a motion for orders for medical examination and site inspection (ECF No.
241), and a motion for evidentiary hearing (ECF No. 239).
On August 14, 2017, Lisle’s counsel filed an ex parte Motion to Withdraw or for
Appointment of Conflict Counsel (ECF No. 243 (sealed)). The Court granted that motion, and
appointed separate counsel for Lisle for the limited purpose of supplementing Lisle’s opposition to
respondents’ motion to dismiss, to assert certain arguments regarding the issue of equitable
tolling of the statute of limitations (ECF Nos. 246, 247 (sealed)). The appointed separate counsel,
A. Richard Ellis, appeared for Lisle on September 6, 2017 (ECF No. 248).
Therefore, the Court will now set a schedule for further briefing of the motion to dismiss and
related motions, as follows:
Within 60 days from the date of entry of this order, Ellis shall file and serve, on Lisle’s
behalf, his supplement to Lisle’s opposition to the motion to dismiss.
Within 30 days after Ellis files the supplement to Lisle’s opposition to the motion to dismiss,
respondents shall file their reply in support of their motion to dismiss, and their responses to the
motion for leave to conduct discovery, the motion for orders for medical examination and site
inspection, and the motion for evidentiary hearing.
Thereafter, Lisle shall, within 30 days, file his replies in support of the motion for leave to
conduct discovery, the motion for orders for medical examination and site inspection, and the motion
for evidentiary hearing.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated September 12, 2017.
this _____ day of September, 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?