KEVIN JAMES LISLE v. E.K. MCDANIEL
Filing
262
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 261 Respondents' Motion for Enlargement of Time is GRANTED. Respondents will have until 11/15/2018, to file their answer. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set forth in 191 the order entered 6/22/2016 will remain in effect. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/3/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
9
10
11
KEVIN JAMES LISLE,
Case No. 2:03-cv-01005-JCM-CWH
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
12
13
TIMOTHY FILSON, et al.,
Respondents.
14
15
16
In this capital habeas corpus action, the respondents are due to file an answer by
17
October 1, 2018. See Order entered July 2, 2018 (ECF No. 260) (90 days from July 2 for
18
answer).
19
On September 26, 2018, Respondents filed a motion for an extension of time (ECF
20
No. 261), requesting a 45-day extension of time, to November 15, 2018, for the answer.
21
This would be the first extension of this deadline. Respondents’ counsel states that the
22
extension of time is necessary because of her obligations in other cases and time away
23
from her office. The petitioner does not oppose the motion for extension of time. The
24
Court finds that Respondents’ motion for extension of time is made in good faith and not
25
solely for the purpose of delay, and that there is good cause for the extension of time
26
requested.
27
28
1
1
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondents’ Motion for Enlargement of Time
2
(ECF No. 261) is GRANTED. Respondents will have until November 15, 2018, to file
3
their answer.
4
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in all other respects, the schedule for further
5
proceedings set forth in the order entered June 22, 2016 (ECF No. 191) will remain in
6
effect.
7
8
October 3, 2018.
DATED THIS ___ day of _____________________, 2018.
9
10
JAMES C. MAHAN,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?