KEVIN JAMES LISLE v. E.K. MCDANIEL
Filing
218
ORDER that within 20 days respondents shall file a reply in support of 182 motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/11/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
9
KEVIN JAMES LISLE,
Case No. 2:03-cv-01006-MMD-CWH
10
11
12
13
Petitioner,
ORDER
v.
RENEE BAKER, et al.,
Respondents.
14
15
16
The respondents in this capital habeas corpus action filed a motion to dismiss on
17
December 26, 2014. (Dkt. no. 182.) The petitioner, Kevin James Lisle, filed an
18
opposition to that motion on April 27, 2015. (Dkt. no. 206.)
19
20
21
22
23
24
On May 12, 2015, Lisle’s counsel filed an ex parte motion to withdraw. (Dkt. no.
213.) That motion is pending.
On May 28, 2015, the Court ordered further briefing of the motion to dismiss
suspended pending resolution of the motion to withdraw. (Dkt. no. 216.)
The Court has determined that further limited briefing regarding the motion to
dismiss will be beneficial at this time.
25
It is therefore ordered that, within twenty (20) days from the entry of this order,
26
respondents shall file a reply in support of their motion to dismiss, responding only to
27
Lisle’s argument, at pages 4-10 of his opposition to the motion to dismiss (dkt. no. 206),
28
that the State has waived the statute of limitations defense.
1
The Court will, when appropriate, schedule respondents’ further reply to Lisle’s
2
opposition to the motion to dismiss, and the filing and litigation of Lisle’s anticipated
3
motion for evidentiary hearing.
4
5
DATED THIS 11th day of June 2015.
6
7
MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?