KEVIN JAMES LISLE v. E.K. MCDANIEL
Filing
291
ORDER granting ECF No. 290 Motion to Extend Time. Fourth Amended Petition due by 4/21/2017. It is further ordered that, in all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set forth in the order entered 03/17/2017 ECF No. 284 will remain in effect. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 04/18/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
9
10
11
KEVIN JAMES LISLE,
Case No. 2:03-cv-01006-MMD-CWH
Petitioner,
ORDER
v.
12
13
TIMOTHY FILSON, et al.,
Respondents.
14
15
16
In this capital habeas corpus action, after an 11-day extension of time, the
17
petitioner, Kevin James Lisle, was due to file his fourth amended petition for writ of habeas
18
corpus on April 17, 2017. (See Order entered April 6, 2017 (ECF No. 289).)
19
On April 17, 2017, Lisle filed a motion for extension of time (ECF No. 290),
20
requesting that the time for him to file the fourth amended petition be extended by four
21
more days, to April 21, 2017. Lisle’s counsel states that the extension of time is necessary
22
because of unforeseen work involved in drafting the fourth amended petition. There is no
23
indication that respondents oppose this modest extension of time. The Court finds that
24
Lisle’s motion for extension of time is made in good faith and not solely for the purpose
25
of delay, and that there is good cause for the extension of time requested.
26
It is therefore ordered that petitioner’s motion for extension of time (ECF No. 290)
27
is granted. Petitioner will have until April 21, 2017, to file his fourth amended petition for
28
writ of habeas corpus.
1
2
3
It is further ordered that, in all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings
set forth in the order entered March 17, 2017 (ECF No. 284) will remain in effect.
DATED THIS 18th day of April 2017.
4
5
6
MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?