KEVIN JAMES LISLE v. E.K. MCDANIEL

Filing 324

ORDER that directs the Clerk to send Petitioner's counsel via certified mail, a copy of the document filed under seal at ECF No. 321 (Mailed to counsel on 1/16/2019 - #7013 1710 0001 6894 2976); Petitioner's counsel is to file, under seal, a status report stating their position with respect to Lisle's pro se filling and/or any appropriate motion relative to that filing by 1/30/2019. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/15/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 KEVIN JAMES LISLE, 5 6 7 Case No. 2:03-cv-1006-MMD-CWH Petitioner, ORDER v. WILLIAM GITTERE, et al., 8 Respondents. 9 10 In this capital habeas corpus action, Petitioner Kevin James Lisle is represented 11 by appointed counsel, the Federal Public Defender for the District of Nevada (“FPD”). On 12 January 7, 2019, the Court received a pro se filing from Lisle that has been filed under 13 seal, in part because it concerns the attorney-client relationship (ECF No. 321). It is 14 unclear whether Lisle’s counsel has seen the document he has filed, or whether his 15 counsel are otherwise aware of its contents. The Court will direct the Clerk of the Court 16 to send to Lisle’s counsel a copy of the document and will order Lisle’s counsel to respond 17 ex parte. 18 19 It is therefore ordered that the Clerk of the Court is directed to send to Petitioner’s counsel (and only petitioner’s counsel), by certified mail, a copy of the document filed 20 under seal at ECF No. 321. 21 22 It is further ordered that, within 15 days from the date of this order, Petitioner’s counsel is to file, under seal, a status report stating their position with respect to Lisle’s 23 pro se filling and/or any appropriate motion relative to that filing. 24 DATED THIS 15th day of January 2019. 25 26 27 28 MIRANDA M. DU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?