KEVIN JAMES LISLE v. E.K. MCDANIEL

Filing 365

ORDER granting ECF No. 364 Stipulation to Extend Time. The parties may have until 8/9/2019 to forward a joint recommendation for a Court's expert to determine "whether Lisle is competent to make [a waiver of further proceedings] an d whether his waiver is knowing, intelligent, and voluntary." If they are unable to reach agreement, then each side is to forward two names to the Court by 8/9/2019. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/18/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

Download PDF
1 10 RENE L. VALLADARES Federal Public Defender Nevada Bar No. 11479 DAVID ANTHONY Assistant Federal Public Defender Nevada Bar No. 007978 David_Anthony@fd.org ERIK R. GUENTHER Assistant Federal Public Defender Wisconsin Bar No. 1041774 Erik_Guenther@fd.org STACY M. NEWMAN Assistant Federal Public Defender Nevada Bar No. 14245 Stacy_Newman@fd.org 411 E. Bonneville, Ste. 250 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (702) 388-6577 (702) 388-5819 (fax) 11 Attorneys for Petitioner 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 14 15 KEVIN JAMES LISLE, 16 Petitioner, 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 v. WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden, Ely State Prison & AARON FORD, Nevada Attorney General, Respondents. Case No. 2:03-cv-1006-MMD-CWH STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER DEATH PENALTY CASE 1 On July 5, 2019, this Court adopted the parties proposed stipulation 2 describing the process for recommending of and assistance for a Court’s expert to 3 determine “whether Lisle is competent to make [a waiver of further proceedings] 4 and whether his waiver is knowing, intelligent, and voluntary.” ECF No. 358 at 5; 5 ECF No. 363 at 6. 6 Since that time, the parties have attempted to contact eleven potential 7 experts. Communications with potential experts is more difficult as the parties seek 8 to comply with their agreement, adopted by the Court to, share all communications 9 with potential experts with the other side, either by inclusion on e-mails or through 10 conference calls. ECF No. 363 at 2. 11 The parties have received some responses from potential experts, but will 12 still need to review responses, vet those experts, and see if they can reach 13 agreement as to a recommended expert. Alternatively, the parties will be 14 forwarding separate recommendations to the Court. 15 As a separate matter, David Anthony, the Capital Habeas Unit Chief, will be 16 on personal leave from July 19 – 28, 2019. Mr. Anthony would need to approve the 17 Petitioner’s position regarding this issue. 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 22 23 2 1 The parties respectfully request that the time to submit a proposed agreed 2 upon expert, or separate recommendations of an expert (two per side) until August 3 9, 2019, rather than the originally stipulated date of July 17, 2019. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DATED this 17th day of July, 2019. RENE L. VALLADARES Federal Public Defender AARON FORD Nevada Attorney General /s/ David Anthony /s/ Michael Bongard DAVID ANTHONY Assistant Federal Public Defender MICHAEL BONGARD Deputy Attorney General /s/ Erik R. Guenther 11 ERIK R. GUENTHER Assistant Federal Public Defender 12 /s/ Stacy M. Newman 13 STACY M. NEWMAN Assistant Federal Public Defender 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 3 1 ORDER 2 Based on the stipulation and for good cause shown, it is hereby ordered that 3 the Court agrees that the parties may have until August 9, 2019, to forward a joint 4 recommendation for a Court’s expert to determine “whether Lisle is competent to 5 make [a waiver of further proceedings] and whether his waiver is knowing, 6 intelligent, and voluntary.” If they are unable to reach agreement, then each side is 7 to forward two names to the Court by August 9, 2019. 8 18th Dated this ____ day of July, 2019. 9 10 ___________________________________ MIRANDA M. DU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?