KEVIN JAMES LISLE v. E.K. MCDANIEL

Filing 384

ORDER granting ECF No. 383 Stipulation regarding the scheduling of the mental health examination of Mr. Lisle for purposes of determining whether Mr. Lisle is competent to make a waiver of further proceedings and whether his waiver is knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/6/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 8 RENE L. VALLADARES Federal Public Defender Nevada Bar No. 11479 DAVID ANTHONY Assistant Federal Public Defender Nevada Bar No. 007978 David_anthony@fd.org STACY M. NEWMAN Assistant Federal Public Defender Nevada Bar No. 14245 Stacy_newman@fd.org 411 E. Bonneville, Ste. 250 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (702) 388-6577 (702) 388-5819 (fax) 9 Attorneys for Petitioner 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 13 KEVIN JAMES LISLE, 14 Petitioner, 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 v. WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden, Ely State Prison, AARON FORD, Nevada Attorney General, Respondents. Case No. 2:03-cv-01006-MMD-DJA STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER (DEATH PENALTY CASE) 1 On July 5, 2019, this Court accepted the parties’ stipulation “regarding 2 various aspects of the process for a mental health examination of Mr. Lisle for the 3 purposes of determining whether Mr. Lisle is competent to make a waiver of further 4 proceedings and whether his waiver is knowing, intelligent, and voluntary.” ECF 5 No. 363 at 6. 6 Paragraph 13 of that stipulation provided: Subject to the availability of documents for the expert to review and the expert’s schedule, the parties anticipate the expert could complete the report by December 31, 2019, with the Court scheduling a hearing after conferring with the parties. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Id. at 5 ¶13. On November 4, 2019, this Court appointed Dr. Melissa Piasecki to evaluate Mr. Lisle. ECF No. 382. The parties have been working together on complying with the July 5, 2019 stipulation, which also included details about how the documents would be prepared, how those documents would be transmitted to the expert, and how the expert’s evaluation would be scheduled. See ECF No. 363 at 3–5 ¶¶6–12. On December 20, 2019, the parties had a telephone conference with Dr. Piasecki and reached consensus about scheduling the evaluation. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that: 1. The parties anticipate that Dr. Piasecki will evaluate Mr. Lisle on or around February 9, 2020, or February 10, 2020, depending upon the warden’s ability to ensure proper staffing for the evaluation. The parties anticipate that Dr. Piasecki could complete the report by the end of February. 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2. In all other respects, the parties will continue to comply with the July 5, 2019 stipulation. DATED this 23rd day of December, 2019. RENE L. VALLADARES Federal Public Defender AARON FORD Nevada Attorney General /s/ David Anthony /s/ Michael Bonbard DAVID ANTHONY Assistant Federal Public Defender MICHAEL BONGARD Deputy Attorney General /s/ Stacy M. Newman STACY M. NEWMAN Assistant Federal Public Defender 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 3 1 2 ORDER The parties have submitted a stipulation regarding the scheduling of the 3 mental health examination of Mr. Lisle for purposes of determining whether Mr. 4 Lisle is competent to make a waiver of further proceedings and whether his waiver 5 is knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. 6 7 8 Based on the stipulation and for good cause shown, it is hereby ordered that the Court adopts the parties’ proposed stipulation dated December 20, 2019. 6th January 20 Dated this ____ day of ______________, 20__. 9 10 ___________________________________ MIRANDA M. DU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?