In Re: Western States Wholesale Natural Gas Antitrust Litigation (MDL 1566)

Filing 2048

ORDER granting unopposed 2002 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 8/3/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

Download PDF
Case 2:03-cv-01431-PMP-PAL Document 2002-1 Filed 07/29/11 Page 1 of 3 Philip M. Ballif Durham Jones & Pinegar 111 East Broadway, Ste. 900 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 P: (801) 415-3000 F: (801) 415-3500 pballif@djplaw.com Melvin Goldstein Matthew A. Corcoran GOLDSTEIN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 1757 P Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20036 P: (202) 872-8740 F: (202) 872-8744 mgoldstein@goldstein-law.com mcorcoran@goldstein-law.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Sinclair Oil Corporation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA IN RE: WESTERN STATES WHOLESALE NATURAL GAS ANTITRUST LITIGATION MDL 1566 2:03-CV-1434-PMP-PAL BASE FILE THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: 2:06-CV-00282-PMP-PAL Sinclair Oil Corporation v. OneOK Energy Services Company, L.P. [PROPOSED] ORDER RE STAY OF PROCEEDINGS Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Stay (Doc. No. 2002 _____), filed on July 29, 2011. Having reviewed and considered the matter, IT IS ORDERED that: The Unopposed Motion for Stay (Doc. No. 2002 is GRANTED. ____) Case 2:03-cv-01431-PMP-PAL Document 2002-1 Filed 07/29/11 Page 2 of 3 Respectfully submitted, Dated: July 29, 2011 By: /s/ Philip M. Ballif Philip M. Ballif Durham Jones & Pinegar 111 East Broadway, Ste. 900 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 P: (801) 415-3000 F: (801) 415-3500 pballif@djplaw.com /s/ Melvin Goldstein Melvin Goldstein Matthew A. Corcoran GOLDSTEIN & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 1757 P Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20036 P: (202) 872-8740 F: (202) 872-8744 mgoldstein@goldstein-law.com mcorcoran@goldstein-law.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Sinclair Oil Corporation August 3, 2011 DATED: _____________ _______________________ United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?