Securities and Exchange Commission VS Global Express Capital Real Estate Investment Fund I, LLC et al
Filing
1015
ORDER Granting #1012 MOTION for Attorney Fees (Twenty-Fifth Interim Application For Approval Of Receivers Fees And Expenses) filed by James H Donell. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 9/13/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
13390.3
BYRON Z. MOLDO, SBN 109652
ERVIN COHEN & JESSUP LLP TH
9401 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, 9 FLOOR
BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA 90212
Tel: 310\ 273-6333
Fax: 310\ 859-2325
RANDOLPH L. HOWARD, NV SBN 6688
KOLESAR & LEATHAM, CHTD.
WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL CENTER
400 S. RAMPART BLVD., SUITE 400
LAS VEGAS, NV 89145
TEL: 702-362-7800
FAX: 702-362-9472
Attorneys for James H. Donell,
Permanent Receiver
10
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
14
15
SECURITIES & EXCHANGE
COMMISSION,
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
CASE NO.: CV-S-03-1514-KJD-LRL
Plaintiff,
ORDER APPROVING TWENTY-FIFTH
INTERIM APPLICATION FOR
GLOBAL EXPRESS CAPITAL REAL APPROVAL OF RECEIVER’S FEES
ESTATE INVESTMENT FUND I, LLC, AND EXPENSES
et al.,
v.
Defendants.
Date: September 13, 2011
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Ctrm: 6D
23
24
25
The “Twenty-Fifth Interim Application For Approval Of Receiver’s Fees And
26
Expenses; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities; Declarations Of James H.
27
Donell, Byron Z. Moldo, Randolph L. Howard, and James T. Schaefer In Support
28
Thereof” (“Application”), having been filed with the Court, and notice of hearing
13390.3:1250113.1
1
ORDER APPROVING TWENTY-FIFTH INTERIM APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF RECEIVER’S FEES AND EXPENSES
1
having been served upon all interested parties, the matter came on for hearing on
2
September 13, 2011, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 6D of the above-entitled Court,
3
before the Honorable Kent J. Dawson, United States District Judge. Byron Z. Moldo
4
of Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP appeared on behalf of James H. Donell, Permanent
5
Receiver; James H. Donell, Permanent Receiver appeared; other parties appeared as
6
reflected in the Court’s minutes.
The Court having read and considered the Application, all opposing and reply
7
8
papers, and after hearing the statements and arguments of counsel, and being fully
9
advised in the premises, rules as follows:
1.
10
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Receiver’s fees and expenses for the
11
period January 1, 2011 through June 30, 2011, in the amounts of $9,675.00 and
12
$1,718.45, respectively, are approved.
2.
13
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the fees and expenses of the
14
Receiver’s general counsel, Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP (“ECJ”), for legal services
15
performed on behalf of the Receiver for the period January 1, 2011 through June 30,
16
2011, in the amounts of $23,394.00 and $2,852.51, respectively, are approved.
3.
17
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the fees and expenses of the
18
Receiver’s special Nevada counsel, Kolesar & Leatham, Chtd. (“Kolesar”), for legal
19
services performed on behalf of the Receiver for the period January 1, 2011 through
20
June 30, 2011, in the amounts of $181.00 and $34.75, respectively, are approved.
4.
21
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the fees and expenses of the
22
Receiver’s accountant, Schaefer & Co. (“Schaefer”), for accounting services
23
performed on behalf of the Receiver for the period January 1, 2011 through June 30,
24
2011 in the amounts of $880.40 and $ -0-, respectively, are approved.
25
////
26
////
27
////
28
////
13390.3:1250113.1
2
ORDER APPROVING TWENTY-FIFTH INTERIM APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF RECEIVER’S FEES AND EXPENSES
1
5.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Receiver is authorized to pay the
2
Receiver, ECJ, Kolesar, and Schaefer the amount of approved fees and expenses from
3
the funds in his possession.
4
5
6
7
DATED: September 13, 2011 __________________________________________
KENT J. DAWSON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
13390.3:1250113.1
3
ORDER APPROVING TWENTY-FIFTH INTERIM APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF RECEIVER’S FEES AND EXPENSES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?