William P. Castillo VS E.K. McDaniel. et al., (DEATH PENALTY)

Filing 257

ORDERED that Respondents' Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. 256 ) is GRANTED. Respondents will have until and including September 24, 2021, to file their responding brief on remand. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings on remand set forth in the order entered January 25, 2021 (ECF No. 252 ) will remain in effect.Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 9/7/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LG)

Download PDF
Case 2:04-cv-00868-RCJ-EJY Document 257 Filed 09/08/21 Page 1 of 2 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 *** 5 WILLIAM P. CASTILLO, 6 Petitioner, 7 Case No. 2:04-cv-00868-RCJ-EJY v. 8 9 10 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (ECF NO. 256) WILLIAM GITTERE, et al., Respondents. 11 12 13 In this capital habeas corpus action, on May 25, 2021, the petitioner, William P. 14 Castillo, represented by appointed counsel, filed his opening brief on remand (ECF No. 15 255). Respondents were then due on July 26, 2021, to file their responding brief. See 16 Order entered January 25, 2021 (ECF No. 252) (60 days for responding brief). 17 On July 26, 2021, Respondents filed a motion for extension of time (ECF No. 18 256), requesting a 60-day extension of time, to September 24, 2021, to file their 19 responding brief on remand. This would be the first extension of this deadline. 20 Respondents’ counsel states that the extension of time is necessary because of her 21 obligations in other cases and obligations with respect to administrative matters in the 22 Office of the Attorney General. Petitioner does not oppose the motion for extension of 23 time. The Court finds that the motion for extension of time is made in good faith and not 24 solely for the purpose of delay, and there is good cause for the extension of time. 25 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondents’ Motion for Enlargement of Time 26 (ECF No. 256) is GRANTED. Respondents will have until and including September 24, 27 2021, to file their responding brief on remand. 28 1 Case 2:04-cv-00868-RCJ-EJY Document 257 Filed 09/08/21 Page 2 of 2 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in all other respects, the schedule for further 2 proceedings on remand set forth in the order entered January 25, 2021 (ECF No. 252) 3 will remain in effect. 4 5 DATED THIS 7th day of September, 2021. 6 7 8 ROBERT C. JONES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?