U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Republic Services, Inc.

Filing 312

ORDER that the deadline for the EEOC and Defendants to file the final proposed consent decree is extended to 8/25/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leavitt on 7/12/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

3

4

5

6

Attorneys for Plaintiff EEOC
7

8
9

IThJITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,
12 `3

) Case No.: No. CV-S-04-1352-DAE-LRL
Consolidated with Case No.: CV-S-04-1479-DAE-LRL

Plaintiff, v.

14

15

16

REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC. REPUBLIC SILVER STATE DISPOSAL, INC., DOES 1-10. inclusive. Deft,ndants.

) DECREE; IPROPOSEDI ORDER

) STATUS REPORT RE: CONSENT

17

18

19

ROBERT LAROCCA and WILLIAM LACY,
20 21

) ) ) ) )

)

Plaintiffs,
V.

23

24

25
26

REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC., a Delaware ) corporation. REPUBLIC SILVER STATE DISPOSAL. INC.. a Nevada Corporation, DOES 1-25, ) ) Defendants.

)

27 28

Dockets.Justia.com

ANNA Y. PARK. Regional Attorney, CA Bar No. 164242 SUE J. NOH, Senior Trial Attorney. CA Bar No. 192134 U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYv1ENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 255 East Temple Street, 4th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90012 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: sue.noheeoc.gov lado. 1egaTeeoc.gov

Pursuant to the Order of the Honorable Lawrence R. Leavitt, United States Magistrate Judg
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

(Docket No. 309), counsel for Defendants Republic Services, Inc. ("RSI") and Republic Silver Stat Disposal. Inc. ("RSSD") and Plaintiff U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC" were ordered to file a final proposed consent decree by July 9, 2010. The EEOC and Defendants hav exchanged another red-lined version and are in the process of discussing the remaining issues. Th parties have agreed on almost all of the language in principle, with only minor revisions left to draft an review. The parties believe in good faith that they will be able to finalize the decree followin

additional discussion, but will not be able to file the final proposed decree by the current deadline. Various representatives for the parties, however, are scheduled to take vacations during the next mont and a half. In an attempt to address the lack of availability of the parties, and with the expectation tha no further extension will likely be necessary if the requested additional time is provided, the partie request an extension of time from July 9, 2010 to August 25. 2010 to finalize and lile the propose decree. This extension should be sufficient to accommodate the attorneys schedules and allow fo

io
ii 12 13 14 IS

finalization of the remaining language in the decree. Dated: July 9, 2010 Respectfully submitted, U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION /s/SueJ.Noh SueJ.Noh Attorneys for Plaintiff EEOC Dated: July 9. 2010 LITTLER MENDELSON /s/ Bruce Young Bruce Young Attorneys for Defendants RSI and RSSD
IPROPOSEDI ORDER

16 `7 18 19 20 21
7')

BY:

BY:

23 24

For good cause shown, it is order that the deadline for the EEOC and Defendants to file the final proposed consent decree is extended from July 9, 2010 to August 25, 2010.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26 27 28

Dated: July 12 ,2010 Hon. Lawrence R. Leavitt UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2-