Morgan Stanley High Yield Securities Inc v. Jecklin

Filing 388

ORDER that a hearing shall be conducted on 1/12/2015 10:00 AM in LV Courtroom 6B before Judge Lloyd D. George on the admissibility of the expert report and testimony of Simon Platt. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 232 , 233 , and 234 motions are DENIED without prejudice to their reinstatement by the court upon ruling on the admissibility of the expert report and testimony of Simon Platt. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the scheduling of oral arguments on 231 , 236 , 237 , and 239 Motions shall be addressed at the January 2015 hearing. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 231 , 236 , 239 , 321 , and 363 are DENIED without prejudice to their reinstatement by the court following the oral arguments set to be scheduled on those motions. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 9/29/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 10 MORGAN STANLEY, et al., 11 Plaintiffs, 12 v. 13 2:05-cv-1364-LDG-VCF HANS JECKLIN, et al., ORDER 14 Defendants. 15 16 On December 10, 2013, the magistrate judge conducted a settlement conference, but an 17 agreement was not reached (#386), and the case was returned to the normal litigation track. Four 18 motions for summary judgment are pending (#231, #236, #239 and #321). Also pending is a 19 motion (#363) to reinstate: 20 -- Defendants JPC Holding AG, Christiane Jecklin, Hans Jecklin, and Swiss Leisure 21 Group’s motion in limine to preclude Morgan Stanley’s Expert Witness Simon Platt 22 from offering testimony in support of Morgan Stanley’s first cause of action (#232) 23 24 25 26 -- Defendant John Tipton’s motion in limine to preclude testimony of Simon Platt (#233) 1 -- Defendant George Haeberling’s motion to exclude testimony and reports of Simon 2 Platt and joinder in motions to exclude filed by the Jecklin defendants and by 3 defendant Tipton (#234) 4 -- George Haeberling’s motion to dismiss (#237), and 5 -- George Haeberling’s request to strike plaintiff’s improper response to defendants’ 6 7 evidentiary objections (300). Inasmuch as Morgan Stanley’s claim of alter ego is now prominently supported by the 8 expert report of Simon Platt, the court finds it judicious to rule on the motions in limine as to the 9 admissibility of Platt’s report and testimony before addressing the motions for summary judgment. 10 Accordingly, 11 12 13 THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that a hearing shall be conducted on the12th of January, 2015, at 10:00 a.m., on the admissibility of the expert report and testimony of Simon Platt. THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that defendants JPC Holding AG, Christiane Jecklin, 14 Hans Jecklin, and Swiss Leisure Group’s motion in limine to preclude Morgan Stanley’s Expert 15 Witness Simon Platt from offering testimony in support of Morgan Stanley’s first cause of action 16 (#232), defendant John Tipton’s motion in limine to preclude testimony of Simon Platt (#233), and 17 defendant George Haeberling’s motion to exclude testimony and reports of Simon Platt (#234), are 18 are DENIED without prejudice to their reinstatement by the court upon ruling on the admissibility 19 of the expert report and testimony of Simon Platt. 20 21 22 THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that the scheduling of oral arguments on motions #231, #236, #237, and #239 shall be addressed at the January 2015 hearing. THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that defendants JPC Holding AG, Christiane Jecklin, 23 Hans Jecklin, and Swiss Leisure Group’s motion for summary judgment (#231), defendant John 24 Tipton’s motion for summary judgment (#236), defendant George Haeberling’s motion for 25 summary judgment (#239), Morgan Stanley’s motion for summary judgment (#321), and defendant 26 2 1 George Haeberling’s motion to reinstate prior motions (#363) are DENIED without prejudice to 2 their reinstatement by the court following the oral arguments set to be scheduled on those motions. 3 4 DATED this _____ day of September, 2014. 5 6 ______________________________ Lloyd D. George United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?