Neal-Lomax, et al v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, et al

Filing 387

ORDER Denying 383 Motion for Re-Taxation of Costs. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 4/9/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA *** ) LaKISHA NEAL-LOMAX; LaKISHA ) NEAL-LOMAX as parent and guardian of ) JOSHUA WILLIAM LOMAX; LaKISHA ) NEAL-LOMAX as parent and guardian of ) ALIAYA TIERRAEE LOMAX; ) JUANITA CARR as parent and guardian of) INIQUE ALAZYA LOMAX, and JOYCE ) CHARLESTON, individually and as ) Special Administrator of the Estate of ) WILLIAM D. LOMAX, JR., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) ) LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE ) DEPARTMENT; OFFICER REGGIE ) RADER; TASER INTERNATIONAL, ) INC., an Arizona corporation; and TASER ) INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware ) foreign corporation, ) ) Defendants. ) ) 2:05-CV-01464-PMP-RJJ ORDER The Court having read and considered Defendants' Motion to Retax Costs Pursuant to Previously Filed Bill of Costs (Doc. #383), filed on March 24, 2010, and Plaintiffs' Opposition thereto (Doc. #384) filed April 6, 2010, and good cause appearing, /// /// 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Retax Costs Pursuant to Previously Filed Bill of Costs (Doc. #383) is DENIED. DATED: April 9, 2010. PHILIP M. PRO United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?