Mitchell v. Nevens

Filing 41

ORDER Denying 18 Motion for Reconsideration of this Court's 13 Order dated 03/26/07. Signed by Judge Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leavitt on 02/01/08. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SRK)

Mitchell v. Nevens

Doc. 41

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 LAWRENCE R. LEAVITT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE v. D.W. NEVENS, et al., Respondents. DEANGELO LAMONT MITCHELL, Petitioner, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA *** ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

2:06-cv-00066-RCJ-LRL ORDER

Before the court is petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration of this Court's Order Dated March 26th Denying Appellant's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (#18). No opposition was filed. "Reconsideration is appropriate if the court (1) is presented with newly discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) if there is an intervening change in controlling law." School Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir. 1993) (citation omitted). The court does not find clear error in its prior ruling; nor has there been an intervening change in controlling law or the presentation of newly discovered evidence. Accordingly, and for good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration of this Court's Order Dated March 26th Denying Appellant's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (#18) is DENIED. DATED this 1st day of February, 2008.

Dockets.Justia.com