Mercier v. United States District Court et al

Filing 4

ORDER REGARDING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 2 Order, Report and Recommendations. ORDERED that 2 Report and Recommendations is affirmed, and Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed with prejudice based on an indisputably meritless legal theory and frivolity. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 12/13/06. (MMM)

Download PDF
Mercier v. United States District Court et al Doc. 4 Case 2:06-cv-01433-PMP-LRL Document 4 Filed 12/15/2006 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 D IS T R IC T OF NEVADA 8 *** 9 G E O R G E MERCIER, 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Dockets.Justia.com ) ) P l a in tif f , ) v. ) ) U N IT E D STATES DISTRICT COURT, et al., ) ) ) D e f e n d a n ts . ) ) 2 :0 6 -C V -0 1 4 3 3 -P M P -L R L ORDER B e f o re this Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (#2) en tered by the Honorable Lawrence R. Leavitt on November 22, 2006, regarding Plaintiff's C o m p la in t. No Objections to Magistrate Judge Leavitt's Report and Recommendation were f ile d pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C) and Rule IB 3-2 of the Local Rules of Practice. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28 U .S .C . 636(b)(1)(B) and (C) and Local Rule IB 3-2 and determines that the Report and R e c o m m e n d a tio n of the United States Magistrate Judge should be affirmed. \\\\\ \ \ \\ \ Case 2:06-cv-01433-PMP-LRL Document 4 Filed 12/15/2006 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Leavitt's Report and R e c o m m e n d a tio n entered November 22, 2006, is affirmed, and Plaintiff's Complaint is d is m is s e d with prejudice based on an indisputably meritless legal theory and frivolity. D A T E D : December 13, 2006 _______________________________ P H I L IP M. PRO C h ie f United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?