Reed et al v. Mandalay Bay Resort & Casino et al
Filing
58
ORDER DISMISSING case as to defendant Pinkless Inc for want of prosecution. Case terminated. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/7/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
<![CDATA[
Reed et al v. Mandalay Bay Resort & Casino et al
Doc. 58
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge
STEVEN REED, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MANDALAY BAY RESORT & CASINO, et al., Defendants.
2:06-CV-1570 JCM (PAL)
ORDER Presently before the court is the case of Reed et al v. Mandalay Bay Resort & Casino et al (06-cv-01570-JCM-PAL). On September 8, 2009, the court entered an order dismissing this case against defendant Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino (doc. #55), as stipulated to by the parties. On July 26, 2010, pursuant to Local Rule 41-1, the clerk of the court informed plaintiff that, if no action was taken in this case with regards to remaining defendant Pinkless Inc. within thirty (30) days, the court would dismiss the case against defendant for want of prosecution. (Doc. #57). To date, plaintiff has not taken any further action. Accordingly, ... ... ... ...
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the case of Reed et al v. Mandalay Bay Resort & Casino et al (06-cv-01570-JCM-PAL) be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED as to defendant Pinkless Inc. DATED September 7, 2010.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge
-2-
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
