Holmquist et al v. Exotic Cars at Caesars Palace, LLC et al
Filing
182
ORDER Granting 181 Stipulation to Extend Time re 176 MOTION to Enforce Judgment to Arrest Richard Weisman and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support. ( Responses due by 7/31/2017.) Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 7/21/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
ROGER P. CROTEAU, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 4958
ROBERT W. LINDER, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No.
ROGER P. CROTEAU & ASSOCIATES, LTD.
9120 West Post Road, Suite 100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89148
(702) 254-7775
(702) 228-7719 (facsimile)
croteaulaw@croteaulaw.com
Attorney for Defendant
RICHARD L. WEISMAN
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Telephone: (702) 254-7775 • Facsimile (702) 228-7719
ROGER P. CROTEAU & ASSOCIATES, LTD.
• 9120 W. Post Road, Suite 100 • Las Vegas, Nevada 89148 •
7
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
***
11
12
JAMES A. HOLMQUIST AND SCOTT A.
WHITE,
13
Plaintiffs,
14
vs.
15
EXOTIC CARS AT CAESARS PALACE,
LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY
COMPANY AND RICHARD L. WEISMAN,
INDIVIDUALLY,
Defendants.
16
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:07-cv-00298 RLH (GWF)
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO ARREST
DEFENDANT/JUDGMENT DEBTOR
RICHARD L. WEISMAN
(First Request)
18
19
COMES NOW Plaintiffs, JAMES A. HOLMQUIST and SCOTT A. WHITE and
20
Defendant RICHARD L. WEISMAN, by and through their undersigned counsel, and hereby
21
stipulate and agree as follows:
22
1.
On July 3, 2017, Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Enforce Judgment to Arrest Richard
23
Weisman herein [ECF #176]. Defendant’s response to said Motion is due on July
24
20, 2017. (July 17 + 3 days for mailing).
25
26
2.
Due to having been recently retained, Defendant’s counsel has been unable to
properly evaluate and respond to Plaintiff’s Motion.
27
28
Page 1 of 3
1
3.
Defendant RICHARD WEISMAN shall have an additional period of time until
2
and including July 31, 2017, in which to file a Response to Plaintiff’s Motion to
3
Enforce Judgment.
4
4.
This Stipulation is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.
5
6
day of July, 2017.
ROGER P. CROTEAU & ASSOCIATES, LTD.
MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING
8
Telephone: (702) 254-7775 • Facsimile (702) 228-7719
ROGER P. CROTEAU & ASSOCIATES, LTD.
• 9120 W. Post Road, Suite 100 • Las Vegas, Nevada 89148 •
7
Dated this 20th
9
10
11
12
/s/ Roger P. Croteau
ROGER P. CROTEAU, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 4958
9120 West Post Road, Suite 100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89148
(702) 254-7775
Attorney for Defendant
Richard Weisman
/s/ Jason M. Gerber
JASON M. GERBER, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 9812
10001 Park Run Drive
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
702-634-5000
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Holmquist and White
13
14
15
PERRY & PERRY
16
17
18
19
20
21
/s/ Shawn M. Perry
SHAWN M. PERRY, ESQ. (pro hac vice)
Minnesota Bar No. 185000
Parkdale Plaza, Suite 336
1660 Highway 100 South
Minnesapolis, MN 55416
952-546-3845
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Holmquist and White
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED
24
25
26
JUDGE, STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED U.S. DISTRICT COURT
DATE:
27
28
Page 2 of 3
July 21, 2017
1
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this
20th
day of July, 2017, I served via the United
3
States District Court CM/ECF electronic filing system, the foregoing STIPULATION AND
4
ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
5
ENFORCE JUDGMENT to the following parties:
6
8
Telephone: (702) 254-7775 • Facsimile (702) 228-7719
ROGER P. CROTEAU & ASSOCIATES, LTD.
• 9120 W. Post Road, Suite 100 • Las Vegas, Nevada 89148 •
7
9
10
11
MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING
JASON M. GERBER, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 9812
10001 Park Run Drive
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
702-634-5000
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Holmquist and White
PERRY & PERRY
SHAWN M. PERRY, ESQ. (pro hac vice)
Minnesota Bar No. 185000
Parkdale Plaza, Suite 336
1660 Highway 100 South
Minnesapolis, MN 55416
952-546-3845
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Holmquist and White
12
13
14
15
/s/ Mindy B. Keck
An employee of ROGER P. CROTEAU &
ASSOCIATES, LTD.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?