Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Bel Fuse Inc. et al

Filing 236

ORDER Denying 223 Objection to Document and Denying 235 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 12/6/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DXS)

Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Bel Fuse Inc. et al

Doc. 236

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA *** HALO ELECTRONICS, INC., Plaintiffs, vs. PULSE ENGINEERING, INC., and TECHNITROL, INC., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:07-CV-00331-PMP-PAL ORDER

The Court having read and considered Defendants Pulse Engineering, Inc. And Technitrol, Inc.'s Objection to the Magistrate Judge's October 14, 2010 Order, or in the Alternative, Motion to Exclude (Doc. #223) filed October 28, 2010, Plaintiff Halo's Response in Opposition to Defendants' Objections (Doc. #229#230), Defendants Pulse Engineering, Inc., and Technitrol, Inc.'s Reply Brief (Doc. #231) filed November 15, 2010, and Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendants' Reply Memorandum (Doc. #235) filed November 23, 2010, and finding that Magistrate Judge Leen's Order (Doc. #221) entered October 14, 2010 is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law, and good cause appearing, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' Objection to the

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Magistrate Judge's October 14, 2010 Order, or in the Alternative, Motion to Exclude (Doc. #223) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Strike (Doc. #235) is DENIED. DATED: December 6, 2010.

PHILIP M. PRO United States District Judge

2