Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Bel Fuse Inc. et al

Filing 305

ORDER granting Joint 304 Motion to Extend Deadline. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 12/23/2011. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 11/17/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 1 2 3 HALO ELECTRONICS, INC., 4 5 6 7 Plaintiff, v. PULSE ELECTRONICS, INC. and PULSE ELECTRONICS CORP., 8 2:07-cv-00331-PMP (PAL) JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE TO FILE THE PROPOSED PRE-TRIAL ORDER AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Defendants. 9 10 11 The parties, Halo Electronics, Inc., Pulse Electronics, Inc., and Pulse Electronics Corp., 12 jointly move for a short extension to the deadline for submitting the pre-trial order currently set by 13 the Court. 14 The current deadline for the parties to submit the proposed pre-trial order is November 29, 15 2011. (Doc. No. 301.) The parties jointly request that the Court extend that deadline to December 16 23, 2011. There are multiple reasons the parties seek an extension. First, Magistrate Judge Leen 17 has permitted the parties to file supplemental expert reports on November 17, 2011 and December 18 1, 2011 to address various legal and factual developments since the initial reports were exchanged 19 in Fall 2010. (Doc. No. 303.) These supplemental reports may impact the issues of law and fact 20 included in the proposed Pre-Trial Order, as well as the parties’ exhibit lists, which must also be 21 included in the Pre-Trial Order. It would thus be efficient to reset the deadline for the Pre-Trial 22 Order to a date that is a reasonable time after the last supplemental expert reports are due. Second, 23 the proposed extension will not impact either side’s availability for trial or the agreed upon trial 24 dates submitted to the Court in the pre-trial order. 25 26 27 28 Therefore, the parties respectfully submit that there is good cause to grant this motion and extend the deadline for filing the proposed Pre-Trial Order to December 23, 2011. 1 2 Dated: November 17, 2011 KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP 3 By: /s/ Kristopher L. Reed David E. Sipiora, Pro Hac Vice Kristopher L. Reed, Pro Hac Vice 1400 Wewatta Street, Suite 600 Denver, CO 80202 Telephone: (303) 571-4000 Facsimile: (303) 571-4321 4 5 6 7 8 Attorneys for Defendants Pulse Engineering, Inc. and Technitrol, Inc. 9 10 11 Dated: November 17, 2011 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 12 By: /s/ Michael J. Kane John C. Adkisson (adkisson@fr.com) Michael J. Kane (kane@fr.com) William R. Woodford (woodford@fr.com) 3200 RBC Plaza 60 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: (612) 335-5070 Facsimile: (612) 288-9696 13 14 15 16 17 18 Attorneys for Plaintiff Halo Electronics, Inc. 19 20 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED: 23 24 25 26 27 28 November 17, 2011 Dated: __________________, 2011 __________________________________ The Honorable Philip M. Pro United States District Judge 1 2 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on November 17, 2011, I caused a true and correct copy of JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE TO FILE THE PROPOSED PRE-TRIAL ORDER AND [PROPOSED] ORDER to be served electronically via the Court’s CM/ECF system on the following: 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 William R. Woodford Michael J. Kane John C. Adkisson Fish & Richardson P.C. 60 South Sixth Street Suite 3300 Minneapolis, MN 55402 woodford@fr.com kane@fr.com adkisson@fr.com Juanita R. Brooks Fish & Richardson P.C. 12390 El Camino Real San Diego, CA 92130 brooks@fr.com Kelly A. Evans Paul Swenson Prior Snell & Wilmer LLP 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway Suite 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89169 kevans@swlaw.com sprior@swlaw.com Attorneys for Defendants Pulse Engineering, Inc. and Technitrol, Inc. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /s/ Susan Stenen Susan Stenen

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?