Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Bel Fuse Inc. et al
Filing
305
ORDER granting Joint 304 Motion to Extend Deadline. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 12/23/2011. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 11/17/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
1
2
3
HALO ELECTRONICS, INC.,
4
5
6
7
Plaintiff,
v.
PULSE ELECTRONICS, INC. and PULSE
ELECTRONICS CORP.,
8
2:07-cv-00331-PMP (PAL)
JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND THE
DEADLINE TO FILE THE PROPOSED
PRE-TRIAL ORDER AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Defendants.
9
10
11
The parties, Halo Electronics, Inc., Pulse Electronics, Inc., and Pulse Electronics Corp.,
12
jointly move for a short extension to the deadline for submitting the pre-trial order currently set by
13
the Court.
14
The current deadline for the parties to submit the proposed pre-trial order is November 29,
15
2011. (Doc. No. 301.) The parties jointly request that the Court extend that deadline to December
16
23, 2011. There are multiple reasons the parties seek an extension. First, Magistrate Judge Leen
17
has permitted the parties to file supplemental expert reports on November 17, 2011 and December
18
1, 2011 to address various legal and factual developments since the initial reports were exchanged
19
in Fall 2010. (Doc. No. 303.) These supplemental reports may impact the issues of law and fact
20
included in the proposed Pre-Trial Order, as well as the parties’ exhibit lists, which must also be
21
included in the Pre-Trial Order. It would thus be efficient to reset the deadline for the Pre-Trial
22
Order to a date that is a reasonable time after the last supplemental expert reports are due. Second,
23
the proposed extension will not impact either side’s availability for trial or the agreed upon trial
24
dates submitted to the Court in the pre-trial order.
25
26
27
28
Therefore, the parties respectfully submit that there is good cause to grant this motion and
extend the deadline for filing the proposed Pre-Trial Order to December 23, 2011.
1
2
Dated: November 17, 2011
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
3
By: /s/ Kristopher L. Reed
David E. Sipiora, Pro Hac Vice
Kristopher L. Reed, Pro Hac Vice
1400 Wewatta Street, Suite 600
Denver, CO 80202
Telephone: (303) 571-4000
Facsimile: (303) 571-4321
4
5
6
7
8
Attorneys for Defendants Pulse
Engineering, Inc. and Technitrol, Inc.
9
10
11
Dated: November 17, 2011
FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
12
By: /s/ Michael J. Kane
John C. Adkisson (adkisson@fr.com)
Michael J. Kane (kane@fr.com)
William R. Woodford (woodford@fr.com)
3200 RBC Plaza
60 South Sixth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Telephone: (612) 335-5070
Facsimile: (612) 288-9696
13
14
15
16
17
18
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Halo Electronics, Inc.
19
20
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED:
23
24
25
26
27
28
November 17, 2011
Dated: __________________, 2011
__________________________________
The Honorable Philip M. Pro
United States District Judge
1
2
3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that on November 17, 2011, I caused a true and correct copy of JOINT MOTION
TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE TO FILE THE PROPOSED PRE-TRIAL ORDER AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER to be served electronically via the Court’s CM/ECF system on the
following:
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
William R. Woodford
Michael J. Kane
John C. Adkisson
Fish & Richardson P.C.
60 South Sixth Street
Suite 3300
Minneapolis, MN 55402
woodford@fr.com
kane@fr.com
adkisson@fr.com
Juanita R. Brooks
Fish & Richardson P.C.
12390 El Camino Real
San Diego, CA 92130
brooks@fr.com
Kelly A. Evans
Paul Swenson Prior
Snell & Wilmer LLP
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 1100
Las Vegas, NV 89169
kevans@swlaw.com
sprior@swlaw.com
Attorneys for Defendants Pulse Engineering, Inc.
and Technitrol, Inc.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
/s/ Susan Stenen
Susan Stenen
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?