Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Bel Fuse Inc. et al

Filing 510

ORDER Granting 509 Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to File Response to 505 MOTION for Permanent Injunction. Responses due by 1/18/2013. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 1/2/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

Download PDF
Case 2:07-cv-00331-PMP-PAL Document 509 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Filed 01/02/13 Page 1 of 3 David E. Sipiora, Pro Hac Vice Kristopher L. Reed, Pro Hac Vice Matthew C. Holohan, Pro Hac Vice KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP 1400 Wewatta Street, Suite 600 Denver, Colorado 80202 Telephone: (303) 571-4000 Kelly Evans, Nevada Bar No. 7691 Swen Prior, Nevada Bar No. 9324 SNELL & WILMER LLP 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Telephone: (702) 784-5200 Facsimile: (702) 784-5252 Attorneys for Defendants Pulse Electronics, Inc. and Pulse Electronics Corp. 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 12 13 HALO ELECTRONICS, INC., Plaintiff, 14 15 16 2:07-CV-00331-PMP-PAL v. PULSE ELECTRONICS, INC., and PULSE ELECTRONICS CORP., UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO HALO’S MOTION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION (First Request) 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 Defendants Pulse Electronics, Inc. and Pulse Electronics Corp. (collectively, “Pulse”) 21 respectively request an extension of time to respond to Halo’s Motion for Permanent Injunction 22 (Docket No. 505) (“Halo’s Motion”). Halo’s Motion is complex, numbering well over 20 pages in 23 length. Halo also has submitted multiple declarations in support of its Motion, including 24 declarations from both fact and expert witnesses. 25 In addition, Halo’s Motion was filed after 5 pm PST on December 21, 2012 – the Friday 26 night before the Christmas holiday. Furthermore, the response window allowed under LR 7-2(b) 27 also encompasses the New Year holiday. These holidays have negatively impacted Pulse’s ability 28 to marshal the factual, expert, and legal resources required to respond fully to Halo’s Motion. 1 Case 2:07-cv-00331-PMP-PAL Document 509 Filed 01/02/13 Page 2 of 3 Therefore, in order to allow Pulse adequate time to respond fully to Halo’s Motion, 1 2 including obtaining responsive factual and expert declarations as necessary, Pulse respectively 3 requests that the Court extend the deadline for Pulse’s response to Halo’s Motion to January 18, 4 2013.1 Per correspondence received from Halo’s counsel, Halo does not oppose this request.2 5 6 7 Dated: January 2, 2013 8 Respectfully submitted, 9 KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP 10 11 /s/ Kristopher L. Reed David E. Sipiora, Pro Hac Vice Kristopher L. Reed, Pro Hac Vice Matthew C. Holohan, Pro Hac Vice 1400 Wewatta Street, Suite 600 Denver, Colorado 80202 Telephone: (303) 571-4000 Facsimile: (303) 571-4321 12 13 14 15 Attorneys for Defendants Pulse Electronics, Inc. and Pulse Electronics Corp. 16 17 18 IT IS SO ORDERED: 19 20 Dated: __________________, 2013 January 2, 2013. 21 __________________________________ The Honorable Philip M. Pro United States District Judge 22 23 24 25 26 1 The current response deadline listed on the Court’s CM/ECF notice is January 7, 2013. 2 27 28 Halo’s counsel indicated on December 28, 2012, that it consents to this request; however, due to technical issues that rendered the Court’s CM/ECF system unavailable for filing this type of request from December 29 through January 1, 2012, Pulse was unable to file the present request until January 2, 2013. 2 Case 2:07-cv-00331-PMP-PAL Document 509 Filed 01/02/13 Page 3 of 3 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I certify that on January 2, 2013, I caused a true and correct copy of UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO HALO’S MOTION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION (First Request) to be served electronically through the Clerk of Court’s Electronic Case Filing System and ECF will send an email notice of the electronic filing to the following: 3 4 5 Thomas M. Melsheimer Fish & Richardson P.C. 1717 Main Street, Suite 5000 Dallas, TX 75201 melsheimer@fr.com 6 7 8 William R. Woodford Michael J. Kane John C. Adkisson Fish & Richardson P.C. 60 South Sixth Street Suite 3300 Minneapolis, MN 55402 woodford@fr.com kane@fr.com adkisson@fr.com 9 10 11 12 13 Juanita R. Brooks Fish & Richardson P.C. 12390 El Camino Real San Diego, CA 92130 brooks@fr.com 14 15 16 Lori N. Brown Harmon & Davies, P.C. 1428 S. Jones Boulevard Las Vegas, NV 89146 lbrown@h-dlaw.com 17 18 19 Attorneys for Plaintiff Halo Electronics, Inc. 20 24 Kelly A. Evans Paul Swenson Prior Snell & Wilmer LLP 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway Suite 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89169 kevans@swlaw.com sprior@swlaw.com 25 Attorneys for Pulse Electronics, Inc. and Pulse Electronics Corp. 21 22 23 26 27 28 /s/ Kristopher L. Reed ______ 64641070v1 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?