Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Bel Fuse Inc. et al
Filing
510
ORDER Granting 509 Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to File Response to 505 MOTION for Permanent Injunction. Responses due by 1/18/2013. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 1/2/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
Case 2:07-cv-00331-PMP-PAL Document 509
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Filed 01/02/13 Page 1 of 3
David E. Sipiora, Pro Hac Vice
Kristopher L. Reed, Pro Hac Vice
Matthew C. Holohan, Pro Hac Vice
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
1400 Wewatta Street, Suite 600
Denver, Colorado 80202
Telephone: (303) 571-4000
Kelly Evans, Nevada Bar No. 7691
Swen Prior, Nevada Bar No. 9324
SNELL & WILMER LLP
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Telephone: (702) 784-5200
Facsimile: (702) 784-5252
Attorneys for Defendants Pulse Electronics,
Inc. and Pulse Electronics Corp.
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
11
12
13
HALO ELECTRONICS, INC.,
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
2:07-CV-00331-PMP-PAL
v.
PULSE ELECTRONICS, INC., and
PULSE ELECTRONICS CORP.,
UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
RESPONSE TO HALO’S MOTION
FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION
(First Request)
17
Defendants.
18
19
20
Defendants Pulse Electronics, Inc. and Pulse Electronics Corp. (collectively, “Pulse”)
21
respectively request an extension of time to respond to Halo’s Motion for Permanent Injunction
22
(Docket No. 505) (“Halo’s Motion”). Halo’s Motion is complex, numbering well over 20 pages in
23
length. Halo also has submitted multiple declarations in support of its Motion, including
24
declarations from both fact and expert witnesses.
25
In addition, Halo’s Motion was filed after 5 pm PST on December 21, 2012 – the Friday
26
night before the Christmas holiday. Furthermore, the response window allowed under LR 7-2(b)
27
also encompasses the New Year holiday. These holidays have negatively impacted Pulse’s ability
28
to marshal the factual, expert, and legal resources required to respond fully to Halo’s Motion.
1
Case 2:07-cv-00331-PMP-PAL Document 509
Filed 01/02/13 Page 2 of 3
Therefore, in order to allow Pulse adequate time to respond fully to Halo’s Motion,
1
2
including obtaining responsive factual and expert declarations as necessary, Pulse respectively
3
requests that the Court extend the deadline for Pulse’s response to Halo’s Motion to January 18,
4
2013.1
Per correspondence received from Halo’s counsel, Halo does not oppose this request.2
5
6
7
Dated: January 2, 2013
8
Respectfully submitted,
9
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
10
11
/s/ Kristopher L. Reed
David E. Sipiora, Pro Hac Vice
Kristopher L. Reed, Pro Hac Vice
Matthew C. Holohan, Pro Hac Vice
1400 Wewatta Street, Suite 600
Denver, Colorado 80202
Telephone: (303) 571-4000
Facsimile: (303) 571-4321
12
13
14
15
Attorneys for Defendants Pulse Electronics,
Inc. and Pulse Electronics Corp.
16
17
18
IT IS SO ORDERED:
19
20
Dated: __________________, 2013
January 2, 2013.
21
__________________________________
The Honorable Philip M. Pro
United States District Judge
22
23
24
25
26
1
The current response deadline listed on the Court’s CM/ECF notice is January 7, 2013.
2
27
28
Halo’s counsel indicated on December 28, 2012, that it consents to this request; however, due to technical
issues that rendered the Court’s CM/ECF system unavailable for filing this type of request from December
29 through January 1, 2012, Pulse was unable to file the present request until January 2, 2013.
2
Case 2:07-cv-00331-PMP-PAL Document 509
Filed 01/02/13 Page 3 of 3
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I certify that on January 2, 2013, I caused a true and correct copy of UNOPPOSED
REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO HALO’S MOTION
FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION (First Request) to be served electronically through the Clerk
of Court’s Electronic Case Filing System and ECF will send an email notice of the electronic filing
to the following:
3
4
5
Thomas M. Melsheimer
Fish & Richardson P.C.
1717 Main Street, Suite 5000
Dallas, TX 75201
melsheimer@fr.com
6
7
8
William R. Woodford
Michael J. Kane
John C. Adkisson
Fish & Richardson P.C.
60 South Sixth Street
Suite 3300
Minneapolis, MN 55402
woodford@fr.com
kane@fr.com
adkisson@fr.com
9
10
11
12
13
Juanita R. Brooks
Fish & Richardson P.C.
12390 El Camino Real
San Diego, CA 92130
brooks@fr.com
14
15
16
Lori N. Brown
Harmon & Davies, P.C.
1428 S. Jones Boulevard
Las Vegas, NV 89146
lbrown@h-dlaw.com
17
18
19
Attorneys for Plaintiff Halo Electronics, Inc.
20
24
Kelly A. Evans
Paul Swenson Prior
Snell & Wilmer LLP
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 1100
Las Vegas, NV 89169
kevans@swlaw.com
sprior@swlaw.com
25
Attorneys for Pulse Electronics, Inc. and Pulse Electronics Corp.
21
22
23
26
27
28
/s/ Kristopher L. Reed ______
64641070v1
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?