Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Bel Fuse Inc. et al

Filing 519

ORDER Denying 444 Defendant's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and Denying 461 Plaintiff's Counter Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law as Moot. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 03/11/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 HALO ELECTRONICS, INC., 8 Plaintiff, 9 vs. 10 PULSE ELECTRONICS, INC., et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:07-CV-00331-PMP-PAL ORDER 14 On November 14, 2012, after Plaintiff Halo Electronics had completed 15 presentation of its case in chief before the jury, Defendant Pulse Electronics, Inc. 16 filed Defendants’ Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law of Non-Infringement, No 17 Induced Infringement, and No Willfulness (Docs. #444 and #445). Pulse 18 Supplemented its Motion (Doc. #455) on November 18, 2012. On November 19, 19 2012, Plaintiff Halo filed a written Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Judgment 20 as a Matter of Law Under Rule 50(a) (Doc. #458). 21 On November 20, 2012, Plaintiff Halo Electronics, Inc. also filed a Motion 22 for Judgment as a Matter of Law Under Rule 50(a) and Rule 52(c) (Doc. #461). 23 Defendant Pulse filed a Response to Plaintiff Halo’s Motion (Doc. #499) on 24 December 4, 2012. 25 26 On November 26, 2012, the jury returned verdicts in favor of Plaintiff Halo and against Defendant Pulse on most of the infringement claims asserted, and 1 also found Defendant Pulse’s infringement to be willful and awarded monetary 2 damages. 3 The Court finds the evidence adduced at trial clearly supports the verdicts 4 returned by the jury and therefore concludes that Defendant Pulse’s Motions for 5 Judgment as a Matter of Law (Doc. #444, #445, #455), must be denied. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Halo’s Counter Motion for 8 Judgment as a Matter of Law (Doc. #461) is DENIED as moot in view of the 9 verdicts of the jury. 10 DATED: March 11, 2013. 11 12 13 PHILIP M. PRO United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?