Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Bel Fuse Inc. et al

Filing 618

ORDER Granting 616 Motion to Extend Time to Reply re 608 Motion for Enhanced Damages and Attorney Fees. Replies due by 12/30/2016. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 12/7/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Thomas M. Melsheimer (melsheimer@fr.com) (admitted pro hac vice) (TX #13922550) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 1717 Main Street, Suite 5000 Dallas, TX 75201 Dallas, TX 75201 Telephone: (214) 747-5070 Facsimile: (214) 747-2091 Craig E. Countryman (countryman@fr.com) (admitted pro hac vice) (CA #244601) Juanita Brooks (brooks@fr.com) (admitted pro hac vice) (CA #75934) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 12390 El Camino Real San Diego, CA 92130 Telephone: (858) 678-5070 Facsimile: (858) 678-5099 Michael J. Kane (kane@fr.com) (admitted pro hac vice) (MN #247625) William R. Woodford (woodford@fr.com) (admitted pro hac vice) (MN#322595) John C. Adkisson (admitted pro hac vice) (MN #266358) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 3200 RBC Plaza 60 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: (612) 335-5070 Facsimile: (612) 288-9696 Attorneys for Plaintiff HALO ELECTRONICS, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HALO ELECTRONICS, INC., Plaintiff, vs. PULSE ENGINEERING, INC., and PULSE ELECTRONICS, CORP., Defendants. 2:07-cv-00331-APG (PAL) UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR EXTENTION OF TIME TO FILE 1 Plaintiff Halo Electronics, Inc. respectively requests an extension of time to file its reply 2 brief in support of its Motion for Enhanced Damages and Attorney Fees. (D.I. 608.) After the 3 Status Conference on September 27, 2016, the Court issued minutes that set a December 16, 2016, 4 deadline for Halo’s brief. Halo seeks a two-week extension to December 30, 2016. Halo requests 5 this extension because Pulse’s opposition seeks to rely on evidence that is not in the record, namely 6 two opinions of counsel that had been maintained as privileged by Pulse throughout discovery and 7 trial. Halo agreed to the briefing schedule during the status conference based on Pulse’s 8 representations that the briefing would be focused on the record developed at trial. 9 10 Pulse does not oppose Halo’s request for an extension of time. This is the first request for an extension of time for Halo’s reply brief on its Motion for Enhanced Damages and Attorney Fees. 11 12 Dated: December 6, 2016 13 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 14 15 By:/s/ William R. Woodford. William R. Woodford (pro hac vice) (woodford@fr.com) 16 17 Attorneys for Plaintiff HALO ELECTRONICS, INC. 18 19 20 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED: Dated: December 7 , 2016 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 2 3 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document has been served on December 6, 2016 to all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Civil Local Rule 5005 (b)(2). 5 6 7 8 9 10 /s/ William R. Woodford William R. Woodford woodford@fr.com Attorneys for Plaintiff HALO ELECTRONICS, INC. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?