Federal Trade Commission v. Ewing et al

Filing 30

ORDER that the Court will treat 27 Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission's Reply to Defendants Objection to the Admission of Consumer Complaints Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 807 as a motion. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Crystal Ewing shall file any response she deems necessary on or before October 1, 2014.FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission shall file any reply it deems necessary on or before October 8, 2014. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 9/24/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4

DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
6

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
7

Plaintiff,
8

v.
9
10

CRYSTAL A. EWING, et al.

11

Defendants.

***
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

2:07-cv-00479-PMP-GWF
ORDER

12

In light of the letter received from Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission (Doc.

13
14
15

#29),
IT IS ORDERED that the Court will treat Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission’s

16

Reply to Defendant’s Objection to the Admission of Consumer Complaints Pursuant to Fed.

17

R. Evid. 807 (Doc. #27) as a motion.

18
19
20
21

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Crystal Ewing shall file any
response she deems necessary on or before October 1, 2014.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission shall file
any reply it deems necessary on or before October 8, 2014.

22
23

DATED: September 24, 2014

24
25
26

_______________________________
PHILIP M. PRO
United States District Judge