Akers et al v. Keszei et al
Filing
365
ORDER Denying 363 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 2/7/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
9
10
11
12
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
JAMES KESZEI, et al.,
)
)
Defendants. )
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:07-cv-00572-JCM-GWF
ORDER
Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike
Reply (#363)
13
14
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike the Reply Memorandum
15
of Defendant James Keszei Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 11 Pre-Filing Investigation
16
Clause (#363), filed on January 27, 2012, and Defendant Keszei’s Response to Plaintiff’s Motion
17
to Strike Reply Brief (#364), filed on January 30, 2012. Plaintiff requests that the Court strike
18
Defendant Keszei’s Reply in Support of his Motion to Dismiss (#355) because Defendant Keszei
19
violated Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 by filing pleadings without conducting reasonable
20
investigation. Plaintiff points to several statements in Defendant Keszei’s Reply, which he believes
21
are “void of proof and truth.” Upon review, the Court finds Plaintiff’s motion without merit. The
22
Court will not strike Defendant Keszei’s Reply simply because Plaintiff disagrees with the
23
characterization of certain facts. Accordingly,
24
...
25
...
26
...
27
...
28
...
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike the Reply Memorandum of
2
Defendant James Keszei Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 11 Pre-Filing Investigation Clause
3
(#363) is denied.
4
DATED this 7th day of February, 2012.
5
6
7
______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?