Ruffin v. Director Nevada Department of Corrections et al
Filing
69
ORDER that petitioner shall file a response to respondents motion 68 for reconsideration within 7 calendar days from entry of this order. Respondents shall have 7 calendar days from the filing date of petitioners response within which to file a reply. Signed by Judge Roger L. Hunt on 8/10/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
KEVIN TYRONE RUFFIN,
9
Petitioner,
2:07-cv-00721-RLH-PAL
10
11
vs.
ORDER
12
13
14
DIRECTOR NEVADA DEPARTMENT
OF CORRECTIONS, et al.,
Respondents.
15
16
This represented habeas matter under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is the Court on respondents’
17
motion (#68) for reconsideration as to the Court’s recent order scheduling an evidentiary
18
hearing on the remaining claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel in Grounds 2, 3, 5,
19
6 and 7. The Court will order expedited briefing, but with the proviso that the pendency of the
20
motion will not provide a basis for not preparing for the hearing or complying with prehearing
21
deadlines. Counsel should proceed on the assumption that the hearing will go forward as
22
scheduled.
23
24
25
26
IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that petitioner shall file a response to respondents’
motion (#68) for reconsideration within 7 calendar days from entry of this order.
IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that respondents shall have 7 calendar days from the
filing date of petitioner’s response within which to file a reply.
27
Extension of the deadlines established herein will be considered in only the most
28
extraordinary of circumstances. The pendency of the motion for reconsideration shall
1
not provide a basis either for resetting the evidentiary hearing or extending prehearing
2
deadlines.
3
DATED: August 10, 2011.
4
5
6
7
_________________________________
ROGER L. HUNT
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?