Overstreet v. Advanced Architectural Metals, Inc. et al

Filing 97

ORDER Denying 95 Motion for Extension of Time to Oppose Closing of Proceedings and 96 Motion to Receive Complete File. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 5/5/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA *** ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2 :07-CV-00781-PMP-LRL ORDER CORNELE A. OVERSTREET, Regional, Director of the Twenty-Eighth Region of 9 the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the NATIONAL LABOR 10 RELATIONS BOARD, 8 11 12 13 Petitioner, v. ADVANCED ARCHITECTURAL METALS, INC., and its alter egos 14 ADVANCED METALS, INC., and STEEL SPECIALTIES UNLIMITED, 15 INC., a Single Employer, 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Respondents. On March 31, 2009, the Court entered an Order (Doc. #87) requiring back pay and fringe benefit contributions. One year later, on March 30, 2010, the Court entered an Order (Doc. #93) granting Petitioner's Motion to Close Proceedings (Doc. #92). On April 12, 2010, interested party Lori Irish filed a Motion for an Extension of Time to Oppose Closing of Proceedings (Doc. #95) and Motion to Receive Complete File by interested party Lori Irish (Doc. #96). Although the Court recognizes that interested party Lori Irish has been imprisoned as a result of a separate criminal proceeding which arose from incidents occurring between 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 interested party Lori Irish and counsel involved in the instant civil action, the Court finds no good cause to grant either of the Motions filed on behalf of interested party Lori Irish. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that interested Party Lori Irish's Motion for an Extension of Time to Oppose Closing of Proceedings (Doc. #95) and Motion to Receive Complete File by interested Party Lori Irish (Doc. #96) are DENIED. DATED: May 5, 2010. PHILIP M. PRO United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?