Warmsley v. Aesculap Company, et al.,

Filing 134

ORDER that the pending motions in this case 106 117 121 122 are DENIED without prejudice to their reinstatement if settlement is not eventually reached. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 9/15/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

Download PDF
Warmsley v. Aesculap Company, et al., Doc. 134 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ______________________________ Lloyd D. George United States District Judge 15th DATED this _____ day of September, 2010. Whereas the parties have reached a tentative settlement in this case and are awaiting approval of the settlement agreement by Medicare, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that the pending motions in this case (#106, #117, #121, and #122) are DENIED without prejudice to their reinstatement if settlement is not eventually reached. v. AESCULAP IMPLANT SYSTEMS, INC. Defendant. DARREL WARMSLEY, Plaintiff, ORDER 2:07-cv-0812-LDG-LRL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?